×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

LRFD Approach to HSS Tubing

LRFD Approach to HSS Tubing

LRFD Approach to HSS Tubing

(OP)
I need a steel guy (or gal) for this one.
Re: AISC LRFD Manual, 3rd Ed. Chapter 16.2, Hollow steel structural sections.

My problem is in dealing with Sect. 5.1 for a round HSS tube used in flexure. Table 2.2-1 shows the maximum limiting D/t ratios for local buckling under several usages. Now, for a 65ksi material with Lambda-r varying in the range of 138 to 200 for a hollow circular section, the limiting Mn/S is shown by equation (5.1-2).  

If I run a spreadsheet on varying D/t values in the range of 138 to 184, the resulting Fb varies from 69.4 ksi to 52.0 ksi. For comparison, if I look at ASCE's Manual 72 (for tapered steel transmission poles), the limiting Fb values for that same D/t range are 58.5 to 55.3 ksi, respectively.

I can understand why Manual 72 would tend to be a little more conservative because of how the tubes might be fabricated and seam-welded, but my question is this: Why would AISC have an equation that produces a permissible stress of 69.4 ksi when the yield strength of the material used is only 65 ksi?

http://www.spiraleng.com

RE: LRFD Approach to HSS Tubing

You are thinking in terms of ASD by looking at stress compared to Fy.  It is true that equation 5.1-2 gives the nominal moment as:

(some factor >1) times Fy times S

But the commentary for 5.1 offers some insight into the situation.  The section actually develops some, or all of its PLASTIC moment strength, thus, the limit state for your range of D/t between p and r does exceed Fy when combined with S....but you have a condition where your stress is somewhere between elastic and fully plastic.

If you notice, equation 5.1-1 uses Z while the other two use S.  This is because the behavior in 5.1-1 is FULLY plastic while the other two are only partially plastic.

RE: LRFD Approach to HSS Tubing

(OP)

JAE:

Thanks for the comeback.

Yes, I did notice the use of the plastic modulus Z where D/t is less than Lambda-P. But, I wasn't dealing with the range between P (D/t=138) and R (D/t=32), but rather for a range above P (but less than 0.448E/Fy, which is 200).

What I gather from what you are saying is that even as we transition from D/t's below 138 to values above 138, we are still sort of floating in a nebulous area where the material is trying to determine if it wants to be plastic or elastic.

Evidently, according to the way that 5.1-2 works out, tests have shown that the behavior is somewhere in between.  So, in order to obtain Mn in that region, one would still use the regular section modulus S, but would be allowed to multiply it by an Fyb larger than Fy in order to simulate the partial plasicity of the material.

According to the Commentary, then, it seems that we would be in a range where the shape factor Z/S would equal about 1.07 (69.4 ksi/65 ksi).  And, this would steadily diminish as D/t approached 148, at which time we would be limited to Fy again.  Of course, for values from 148 to 200, the allowable stress would gradually diminish below Fy until it actually went down to 48 ksi (where D/t=200).

Am I on the right track here?

http://www.spiraleng.com

RE: LRFD Approach to HSS Tubing

Polecat - yes...you said it all great...especially your paragraph 3 "Evidently...".

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
White Paper - Using Virtualization for IVI and AUTOSAR Consolidation on an ECU
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicle’s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close