Wf 4.0 versus Creo 3

• Apr 10, 2017

• #2

dgallup

Automotive

May 9, 2003

4,715

US

No.

----------------------------------------

The Help for this program was created in Windows Help format, which depends on a feature that isn't included in this version of Windows.

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

• Apr 10, 2017

• #3

looslib

Mechanical

Jul 9, 2001

4,205

US

While a technically correct answer, I will add it depends on what hardware you had for WF4.
If you had 32-bit OS, 4GB memory and a marginal graphics card with 512MB/1GB, Creo 3 will not run to your satisfaction.
IF you had a 64-bit OS, 16+GB memory and a high end Nvidia graphics card with 3/4GB, Creo 3 will only seem a little bit slower, if at all.



"Wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."

Ben Loosli

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

• Apr 11, 2017

• Thread starter
• #4

peppinu

Automotive

Apr 21, 2003

270

MT

Thanks to both of you.
I was once led to believe that wf4 could not use all CPU cores whilst creo 3 makes use of multiple cores.
I reasoned out that provided the hardware is decent (Fujistu with xeon @ 2.8Ghz with Quadro k2000) creo would perform better on the same hardware, compared to wf4.

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

• Apr 11, 2017

• #5

dgallup

Automotive

May 9, 2003

4,715

US

There is very little in any version that uses multiple processor cores. Assembly retrieval can open one part per core but this is usually speed limited by hard disk or network speed so it makes no difference. Regenning a part only runs on one core. FEA uses multiple cores and this can really help.

----------------------------------------

The Help for this program was created in Windows Help format, which depends on a feature that isn't included in this version of Windows.

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

• Apr 12, 2017

• #6

loki3000

Mechanical

Sep 29, 2009

652

SI

i run wf3 at the job and test creo 3.0/ 4.0 at home and i prefer the old UI.

 

Upvote 0 Downvote