×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Coupler in Double Bus Single Breaker
3

Coupler in Double Bus Single Breaker

Coupler in Double Bus Single Breaker

(OP)
The need for bus coupler in double bus single breaker scheme seems a bit unclear for me.

why should a coupler be closed if all circuits can be switched to any of the two buses? would that be to add more flexibility in case of section fault?

RE: Coupler in Double Bus Single Breaker

3
1. A buss coupler is needed if you want to switch between bus bars while the feeder/bay breaker is closed and carrying load. The reason being that with the two busses electrically isolated there might be significant voltage potential between them which would cause serious arcing when the bus disconnects are opened/closed. The bus coupler effectively "short circuits" both busses together greatly reducing the voltage potential between them. In cases where you have buss CTs for step distance protection wired for redundancy (voltage balance relay that toggles each relay to any healthy CT set) it is essential the voltage be the same relative to both bars.

2. Further, if either bus faulted, the bus coupler would open interrupting the short circuit current without taking out the other healthy bus bar. Only half the circuits would be lost. Where the station is non dynamic (one bus is simply a reserve/transfer/backup/service/emergency/auxiliary buss and the other a main bus protected via single buss differential zone) the coupler protects the auxiliary buss and in turn trips when there is a fault on it, thus indicating a problem on the aux bus that would otherwise go unnoticed if the aux bus was run normally de-energized. Remember, you want your backup equipment operational when you need it.

3. Also, if every station in the system is single breaker, double bus; having a coupler "nits" what would essentially be two separate electrical systems perhaps only loosely linked via transmission lines. This would create phase angle differences between every bus bar in the system which makes steady state / load flow operation far more difficult; unequal loading on generators and transformers; and if you had paralleled transformer secondaries with each transformer primary on a different bus there could be "loop flows" where power flows into one transformer and out the other. These phase angle difference are greatly exacerbated with transmission lines or other elements going out of service.

4. A bus coupler can be used to manually remove a known stuck breaker from service while under load. All the other circuits are transferred to one bus bar (I'll pick buss A) while the effected breaker is left on buss B. The bus copuler is then opened dropping the circuit or element with the stuck breaker. The disco leading to the stuck breaker is opened. The bus coupler is then closed and circuits that should be on bus B are put back in that buss.



5. In some cases the coupler is deliberately operated normally open to control load flow or reduce short circuit currents but closed (desired) when system conditions change. An example would be a 115kv / 34.5 kv substation with two 40/50/60 MVA transformers feeding a single breaker double bus secondary. TX1 is normally connected to bar A, and 6 34.5kv outgoing circuits also normally connected to bar A. TX2 is connected to bar B, and another 6 34.5kv circuits connected to bar B. TX1 and TX2 are not run parallel for two reasons in this example: 1. Both have on bard tap changers which are not coordinated with one another and thus differing relative tap potions will result in circulating currents. 2. Both units in parallel will exceed desired short circuit currents, possibly over burdening some equipment. Thus the coupler is normally open. Now, if TX1 or TX2 unexpectedly fail (high and low side TX breakers trip respectively), voltage transformers will sense the loss of voltage on the de-enrgzed bus and after a predetermined delay (say 15 seconds) the bus coupler will close restoring the effected bus and in turn remaining circuits via the other remaining TX.

This is far quicker, easier and cheaper then the logic required without the coupler for circuit restoration. Without a coupler a TX failure would require opening all the breakers on the effected 34.5kv circuits, then opening all the motorized disconnects to the denergized bus, closing the mods into the energized bus, and then closing the 34.5kv breakers there after. Far more that can go wrong...

In addition to the above returning the station to normal would also be a challenge in that the last set of disconnects to open bridging bus A to B may have significant voltage and current between them for a number of reasons (tap position, TX R/X differences, loading variants on each bus). Remember, disconnects are not designed to interrupt high voltage high current conditions, and such the resulting arc will destroy them at best- at worst leading to a flash over arc on the disco that clears both bus bars. Thus the coupler should always be the last object that opens (splits) the two bars after the final electrical bridge (via disconnect) is broken. Ditto for closing discos. The coupler must be the first object to close before a bay discos closes into either bar while the other disco is also closed. The ONLY granted exception to this rule is when opening or closing into a bus bar with absolutely nothing else on it. Generally speaking the disco make/break the small charging current of the bus bar without issue.

RE: Coupler in Double Bus Single Breaker

And oh, to add. Where a breaker bypass exists the coupler breaker is designed to substitute the protection of the bypassed breaker.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close