Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Mercaptans removal

Mercaptans removal

Mercaptans removal

Does any one know if there are any technologies that have higher selectivity for mercaptans removal over H2S? For example, in the natural gas containing both H2S and mercaptans, I prefer to remove mercaptans first, then remove H2S later. But so far, I could not find a technology with no or minimum coabsorption of H2S. Thanks for sharing.

RE: Mercaptans removal

Activated carbon- H2S will rapidly saturate and go right through. Mercaptans will be more strongly retained, with retention increasing with molecular weight.

RE: Mercaptans removal

Hi moltenmetal,
Your idea may eventually work, if just a little of H2S is captured by AC, it should be acceptable. Did you have any practical operating experience of capturing mercaptans with min. coadsorption of H2S?

RE: Mercaptans removal

Dont know of a process that enables this. H2S is more acidic than RSH so H2S tends to get absorbed or adsorbed more easily than RSH in most processes commonly known.

May we know why you wish to remove RSH, and then only H2S ?

RE: Mercaptans removal

I could only partially share some reasons. We are evaluating a technology for H2S removal; however, with high RSH, the equipment cost would be higher. If there is a technology could help reduce the RSH to lower level, overall,it might help to save the total cost.

RE: Mercaptans removal

So you're getting no consolation on the process simulation for this even after you've MAXed out on the piperazine content in activated MDEA at the current circulation rate?

Presume you're not considering MEA due to corrosion / degradation concerns.

Other options may be to optimise the column operation by using options such as intercooling, increasing circulation rate, but these would lead to higher cost as you say.

RE: Mercaptans removal

Documentation with me indicates the Shell Sulfinol X mixed solvent may be suitable for this ( MDEA - piperazine - sulfolane - water) for RSH and H2S removal, if the activated MDEA option ( MDEA - piperazine - water only blend) doesnt cut the cake. If heavy hydrocarbons co absorption is an issue with sulfolane, switch out sulfolane with Selexol. The Sulfinol X process is proprietory to Shell.

Obviously, if you could chill or cool this gas somewhat before the absorber, that will help to knock out the heavier RSH components and the heavy hydrocarbons too, and reduce the heavy HC co absorption associated with sulfolane.

Obviously, a split feed of lean solvent to the absorber may be another option to investigate with any of the solvent options mentioned.

RE: Mercaptans removal

Thanks. Sulfinol-X should remove H2S first; then RSH. We want the other way around.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close