Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Abnormal CBR curve

Abnormal CBR curve

Abnormal CBR curve

thread261-314949: Abnormal CBR vs %compaction?

I was following the referenced thread because i am facing pretty similar issues with my CBR curves. I have 2 set of Standard CBR results (Both GM soil, approx. 18% fines on both). In both tests, the dry density at the maximum blows (65 blows) are slightly less than the Maximum Dry Density, So i had to extrapolate the curve to get the CBR value at 100% of max dry density. And also, the CBR values at lower blows are higher than CBR values at higher blows.

Test 1 (Max Dry Density from Std Proctor = 132.1 pcf)
20 blows----Dry Unit Wt. = 129.1 pcf------CBR at 0.1 in penetration = 13.35%
35 blows----Dry Unit Wt. = 129.7 pcf------CBR at 0.1 in penetration = 10.52%
65 blows----Dry Unit Wt. = 131.2 pcf------CBR at 0.1 in penetration = 10.68%

Final recommended CBR value (@100% max. dry density) = 15.6% (Which i don't think is unusual). Similar results on Test 2 as well. Both similar materials. The Stress vs Penetration curves are also abnormal for the three points (curves crossing each other multiple times and not widely spaced).

Any insights will be greatly appreciated.

RE: Abnormal CBR curve

You should look at how your sample has been handled and if any segregation has occurred. This can cause significant variation in your results for CBR. You mentioned that all 3 CBR curves cross each other which also makes me believe that your samples are segregated, assuming that you should see a very similar curve pattern on all 3 CBRs, each curve higher than the last respective to the number of blows for that sample.

Any significant change in the material, for example one of your samples contains more gravel than the others, the proctor for that sub-sample could be different.

Also investigate the moisture saturation for your CBR samples as inadequate mixing of water will also lead to strange results.

Hope this helps!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close