Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

AASHTO LRFD retaining wall footing bearing pressure distribution

AASHTO LRFD retaining wall footing bearing pressure distribution

AASHTO LRFD retaining wall footing bearing pressure distribution

I've been writing a spreadsheet for retaining wall design and just realized that in section of the LRFD Bridge Specifications, AASHTO specifies a uniform bearing pressure for spread footings on soil. They do specify the typical trapezoidal pressure diagram for spread footings on rock. This seems to go against everything I was taught and have read about retaining wall design. Is there any particular reason for this?

RE: AASHTO LRFD retaining wall footing bearing pressure distribution

Could it be due to the use of reduced bearing area? I looked at a spreadsheet a former coworker developed; he didn't account for this. I have some FHWA publications on substructures; maybe they can shed some light on the matter. I'll look for them later today.

RE: AASHTO LRFD retaining wall footing bearing pressure distribution

It's acceptable to make the bearing stresses uniformly distributed on the footing, by reducing the bearing area.

So, I get it!


ípapß gordo ainÆt no madre flaca!

RE: AASHTO LRFD retaining wall footing bearing pressure distribution

I'm pretty sure those diagrams in Chapter 11 are for determining the bearing resistance, not the actual exerted heel/toe pressures. Then again, the way college professors are wreaking havoc on fundamentals of engineering, they've probably tried to reinvent the wheel - again.

RE: AASHTO LRFD retaining wall footing bearing pressure distribution

The equivalent uniform pressure distribution was originally proposed for MSE Walls many years ago since there was not a rigid foundation interface (soil on soil, I think it was attributed to Myerhoff). The resultant location is determined by the eccentricity of the loading on the structure and distributed over the Base - 2*ecc thus a higher uniform pressure.

At some point in recent years, AASHTO adopted this model for all gravity walls except those with a rigid foundation (ie: on rock as you noted). Even worse than that, overturning is not directly checked anymore and only an eccentricity check is required, ecc < B/3 or something like that. Just about the time you have figured that out, add load factors to the calculation and you get an eccentricity value that is pretty close to meaningless and just an empirical value to be measured against another calculated value.

In the older AASHTO ASD criteria, eccentricity criteria was < B/6 and made some sense (eccentricty in middle third of footing thus no negative heel pressure.) Now it is just numbers. Most people still check overturning but you don't have to.

Just a few thought..

RE: AASHTO LRFD retaining wall footing bearing pressure distribution

Rick it is true that the figure comes from section - Bearing Resistance. However it states: Bearing resistance shall be investigated at the strength limit state using factored loads and resistances, assuming the following soil pressure distributions:
Where the wall is supported by a soil foundation: the vertical stress shall be calculated assuming a uniformly distributed pressure over an effective base area as shown in Figure

bridgebuster I found the answer I was looking for in that FHWA Manual. In section 8.3.2 of that manual it states: As the load on a footing is rarely concentric, the bearing pressure varies across the base of the
footing. The variation in bearing pressure is generally assumed to be linear. For foundations on soil, compression of soil beneath the footing results in a redistribution of bearing stress to a more
uniform value
. Therefore, for foundations on soil, the factored bearing resistance is compared to the factored uniform unit bearing stress acting on the base of a concentrically-loaded footing area

That is definitely not what my soil mechanics prof. taught me in school or what is in any of my textbooks. I have usually used the PennDOT software ABLRFD for any substantial retaining wall design, and I never really paid that much attention to how AASHTO specified to calculate the bearing pressures for footing on soil. I guess I learned something.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - Strategies to Secure Connected Cars with Firewalls
White-hat hackers have demonstrated gaining remote access to dashboard functions and transmissions of connected vehicles. That makes a firewall a vital component of a multilayered approach to vehicle security as well as overall vehicle safety and reliability. Learn strategies to secure with firewalls. Download Now
White Paper - Model Based Engineering for Wire Harness Manufacturing
As complexity rises, current harness manufacturing methods are struggling to keep pace due to manual data exchanges and the inability to capture tribal knowledge. A model-based wire harness manufacturing engineering flow automates data exchange and captures tribal knowledge through design rules to help harness manufacturers improve harness quality and boost efficiency. Download Now
White Paper - What is Generative Design and Why Do You Need It?
Engineers are being asked to produce more sophisticated designs under a perfect storm of complexity, cost, and change management pressures. Generative design empowers automotive design teams to navigate this storm by employing automation, data re-use and synchronization, and framing design in the context of a full vehicle platform. Download Now
eBook - Simulation-Driven Design with SOLIDWORKS
Simulation-driven design can reduce the time and cost of product development. In this engineering.com eBook, we’ll explore how SOLIDWORKS users can access simulation-driven design through the SOLIDWORKS Simulation suite of analysis tools. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close