×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

When NOT to use axisymmetric FEA ?

When NOT to use axisymmetric FEA ?

When NOT to use axisymmetric FEA ?

(OP)
So, the subject says it all:).

What are the disadvantages of using axisymmetric FEA? In which cases would you NOT recommend using it?

Thanks

RE: When NOT to use axisymmetric FEA ?

To perform axisymmetric FEA everything must be axisymmetrical, geometry, material properties, loading. If it fails that, don't use it.

RE: When NOT to use axisymmetric FEA ?

Buckling is another case when everything appears axisymmetric but the behaviour is asymmetric.

RE: When NOT to use axisymmetric FEA ?

I would add dynamic analysis to Corus's post.  It is an obvious addition, but worth mentioning explicitly.

RE: When NOT to use axisymmetric FEA ?

Echoing others: axisymmetric analysis can only take axisymmetric input and only give axisymmetric output. If you have any doubt that your case is fully axisymmetric in both input and output... don't use it.

A circular flat plate is a good example - if you want stresses due to a uniform load, your properties are the same throughout, boundary condition is the same around the perimeter, etc... then you should get the result you want from an axisymmetric model. But if you want to look at buckling or vibration modes, the axisymmetric model can only show you the axisymmetric modes. For vibration modes, for example, you would see the first axisymmetric bending mode (the one that looks like a trampoline with a person jumping dead centre), but you wouldn't see modes where one half of the plate goes up and one goes down. Depending on your loads, you could miss very important effects.

If you'll forgive my bluntness, to my mind there's not really a "recommendation" per se - if it's appropriate to the problem you need to solve, use it; if it's not, don't. If you have any doubt, model the whole thing and see what you get. Better to do too complex a model and get a trivial result than too simple a model and get a useless one (disregarding issues of model size and computation time of course).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - A Guide to 3D Printing Materials
When it comes to using an FDM 3D printer effectively and efficiently, choosing the right material at the right time is essential. This 3D Printing Materials Guide will help give you and your team a basic understanding of some FDM 3D printing polymers and composites, their strengths and weaknesses, and when to use them. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close