Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


How to take reinforcement into account for correlation analysis in ProCOR?

How to take reinforcement into account for correlation analysis in ProCOR?

How to take reinforcement into account for correlation analysis in ProCOR?


I have a problem taking the reinforcement of a bridge reinforced concrete beam into account for correlation analysis in procor/patran/nastran. If I'm correct, procor uses normal modes analysis (sol 103), which makes using of special reinforced elements (rebar?) impossible. So, I made a solid model (hex-elements were used), where the beam working reinforcement rods are solids too, but there're another rods. Some of them are vertical and resist to shear loads, another important ones are located in the slab. And it's pretty complicated to take them into account in a FE model, which is made of hex elements. To understand what I've described, I attached some pics.

One possible solution is to modify the concrete modulus of elasticity, but how? Is it correct to just calculate the proportion of the concrete and reinforcement volumes and find new modulus of elasticity from the proprtion? When I do that the modulus doesn't increase a lot and I think this way isn't right. Might be there a special coefficient for the concrete modulus of elasticity, which makes it possible to take all the reinforcement into account? Or am I going to a wrong direction?

I'm also starting to think there's another soft, which allows to perform correlation analysis without such problems.

Thanks in advance!

1-pic - FEM

2-pic - cross-section

3-pic - longitudinal cut


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close