Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Interpretation of ACI 318 Section (C)

Interpretation of ACI 318 Section (C)

Interpretation of ACI 318 Section (C)

I have a situation where the contractor did not install the embed plates in the foundation wall for the connection of the precast concrete wall panels and I am trying to work out a post-installed solution.

The wall panels carry a light lateral load and are not load bearing (there is a structural steel frame.) A free-body diagram of the panel shows no uplift at the base of the panel.

ACI 318 Section (B) indicates that precast wall panels must have a minimum of (2) tension ties per panel with a nominal strength of 10K per tie.

Sub section (C) goes on to say that if there is no tension at the base, the ties are permitted to be connected to an "appropriately reinforced concrete floor slab on ground."

So, my question is, does the connection, as described in (C) still need to be able to transmit 10K of force, even though it is attached to an element (the foundation) that cannot resist 10K?

Thanks in advance.

RE: Interpretation of ACI 318 Section (C)

By my reading it technically does appear that the ties need 10k of strength. If you read the PCA notes on ACI 318-11, it says that the requirement for 10kip ties is a historic requirement from the PCI Design Handbook (same for 16.5.2). It's all very empirical and I suspect you can justify a deviation from this for you case.

Professional Engineer (ME, NH, MA) Structural Engineer (IL)
American Concrete Industries

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now
White Paper - Are all 3D printed metals the same?
With so many different 3D printing metal systems and processes today, how can you know exactly what you’re getting? Today, there are several different methods for manufacturing 3D printed metal components with their own strengths and limits. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close