Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Register Log in
  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Photoresisistor flame scanner

Status
Not open for further replies.
op9

op9

Industrial
Aug 18, 1999
111
Has anyone had practical experience with running long lengths of cable between a photoresistor flame scanner and a burner controller? More specifically a Siemens LAL2.65 and a QRB1 scanner. The documents say it can be run up to 200mtrs with RG62 coax. I have had some other advice not to use it over 20-30mtrs or there will be problems???
RG62 is a low capacitance coax (47.57pF/mtr) and an impedence of 93ohm. Also any of that coax is not robust and has a solid wire as its core.

As impedence and capacitance effect is to do with AC or a changing waveform which is more applicable with say self checking UV signals, I cant see why it would be critical with a simple photoresistor which is just a variable resistance passing a DC current of say 10-35micro amps.

I would like to use Dekoron screened cable which is more robust. Just for comparison a twisted pair version has a capacitance to ground of 141pF/mtr. Again saying is this going to be an issue with DC current? Resistance is not a problem as it is 13.7ohm/km.

Thanks in advance,
Rod

Rod Nissen.
Combustion & Engineering Diagnostics

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Sort by date Sort by votes
After all of that, what is the resistance of the sensor?
The issue with the resistance and capacitance is how long it will take for the detection to propagate down the cable and how much time you have.

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! faq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
When covered and not detecting light the resistance of the sensor would be >1 Mohm. It starts passing a holding current of >4microamps at about 230kohm and at max light intensity a current of about 30microamps at 8kohm.
Rod

Rod Nissen.
Combustion & Engineering Diagnostics

 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Please explain!!!

The controller flame relay holds in at >4 microamps and as I said before saturates at around 30 microamps. On a diminishing light source the flame relay drops out at < 4 microamps. There is no adjustment for this. Crude but it works. KISS principle.

Rod Nissen.
Combustion & Engineering Diagnostics

 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I have no direct experience with long cabling, but I do have a bar stool opinion.

Given the approval process necessary for flame safeguards (from multiple agencies worldwide), I would expect that Siemens' spec for cable distance is useable.

Did you notice that the twisted pair cabling limit was 20-30m?

LAL2_with_QRB_1_cabling_limits.jpg


I suspect that whomever was telling you 'trouble beyond 20-30m' was inferring twisted pair, not coax. Coax is the exception in that kind field wiring and it wouldn't surprise me if most people weren't even aware of the application of coax for this kind of wiring.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

EEENGRX
  • Locked
  • Question
Frequent Flame Scanner Failure 1
Replies
12
Views
1K
EEENGRX
EEENGRX
un421ate1
  • Locked
  • Question
flame discrimination problem
Replies
2
Views
218
un421ate1
un421ate1
krstill
  • Locked
  • Question
Problem with reducing flame current only when the appliance is cold. 3
Replies
6
Views
304
Compositepro
Compositepro
USAeng
  • Locked
  • Question
kanthal for flame rod?
Replies
4
Views
330
USAeng
USAeng
Esi07
  • Locked
  • Question
Looking to find who makes this specific flame scanner/viewing head
Replies
4
Views
199
Oxidation
Oxidation

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top Bottom