×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Flow profile in the tube side of heat exchanger

Flow profile in the tube side of heat exchanger

Flow profile in the tube side of heat exchanger

(OP)
Experiencing fouling at the tube side (Cooling Water) of a heat exchanger. The HX is of straight tubes with a longitudal baffle at the channel cover to allow for two passes design (TEMA type: BEP).
Cooling water enters thru the bottom nozzle of the channel cover, flow thru the tubes and return to exit at the top nozzle of the channel cover. Hot vapour enters from the shell top nozzle.
Fouling at the CW side observed at the top tubes only. CW flowrate registered at the inlet piping is above 1.8 m/s. At this rate the fouling is unexpected.

Understood that the relatively hot section at the top shell will lead to fouling in the top tubes. But a question to the group, for this type of HX:

1. Will the CW flow velocity in each of the tubes the same? Is it possible that the top tubes are having a lower flow velocity, due to the design, which further contributes to the deposition.  

2.  If we use a U-tubes design, will the occurance be the same?

Appreciate any comment
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: Flow profile in the tube side of heat exchanger

Well I think you'd expect fouling in the top section depending on the water quality. Carbonates would tend to precipitate at hotter temp. Solutions could be frequent backflushing or chemical injection.
I dont think velocities will be different. Why do you think U-tube would be better ? This will make cleaning of  insides of the tubes more difficult.

Samiran

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close