Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


fractionation vacuum tower overhead

fractionation vacuum tower overhead

fractionation vacuum tower overhead

i am looking for overhead-line's design criteria,
the goes from vacuum tower (0.45 bara) to condenser.

RE: fractionation vacuum tower overhead

Criteria for vacuum systems is always allowable pressure drop. How much pressure drop can you afford to lose in the overhead line? There's your answer.

The upper limit is fluid velocity. Gas lines in continuous service should not employ velocities above 15-20 m/sec. For wet steam, reduce that to half of the value.

Process Engineer, MSChE

RE: fractionation vacuum tower overhead

Vacuum tower tops lines usually run at high velocity, but exceeding 20m/sec as suggested on CS lines can cause excessive erosion corrosion in addition to corrosion from H2S, NH3 etc.

Going up to 30m/sec on corrosion resistant alloy ( CRA) piping would be possible, subject to pressure drop permissible for the operation of the ejectors at the condensors. Use isothermal compressible flow expressions for dp calcs on these lines, if dp > 10% of column top exit nozzle pressure in absolute units ( kpa abs or psia abs)

RE: fractionation vacuum tower overhead

I found the following rule:
dp/100 < 0.035*P^1/2 where P is the pressure of top reciver drum
v < min(100/(dens^1/2); 60-80 ft/s)
What do you think about?

RE: fractionation vacuum tower overhead

These are empirical equations, "rules of thumb", that may or may not be applicable to your case.

Look at what vacuum you need inside the column for the most conservative case, start with the design overhead flow and add some 10-20% margin on top of that, and size the overhead line accordingly. That way you can't do wrong.

Process Engineer, MSChE

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Research Report: State of IoT Adoption in Product Development 2019
This research report, based on a survey of 234 product development professionals, examines the current state of Internet of Things (IoT) adoption by product design teams, its perceived importance, and what features and capabilities teams consider important when making decision about adding IoT functionality to their products. Download Now
Research Report: Augmented Reality for Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO)
The term Industry 4.0 denotes a cluster of technologies that’s poised to fundamentally reshape manufacturing and bring about a new industrial revolution. These include 3D printing (AM), the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), artificial intelligence (AI) and mixed reality technologies, more commonly known as virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR). Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close