Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Cquad4 vs Cquadr's

Cquad4 vs Cquadr's

Cquad4 vs Cquadr's

I have been trying to reason why one should choose one element over the other(pros vs cons). It seems to me that CQUAD4 in Nastran is an half-assed attempt to have a proper shell element as you have to specify the 6th degree of rotation artificially with the K6rot term,whereas Cquadr seems like a more complete element formulation, being less sensitive to mesh sizes and quality.
It seems to me that most of the aerospace companies are choosing one over the other without actually thinking the repercussions of one element over the other in the global/local models.Any insights on why you might choose CQUADs over reduced integration elements?

RE: Cquad4 vs Cquadr's

hadn't heard of CQUADR before. is it MSC NASTRAN ? NEI NASTRAN ??

CQUAD4s (with their, yes, flaky R6 issue) have been the default since before ... well forever.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Cquad4 vs Cquadr's

I think all of the Nastrans include those reduced integration elements(Nx,nei,Msc).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close