Hi, hyari!
You have not given the size of the valve here, and I assume the pressure is in not of the higher classes. From producers side the materials could also vary based on size and cost.
In my career I have often come across outdated specifications given from older applications. This could be OK, but it also happens that a valve is no longer commercial available, or replaced by newer, better and now cheaper materials, brands and constructions.
The schoolbook tell us that a valve selection should always be done from start: analyse/good description of fluid and flow (note: with possible variations over time, including dry periodes and cleaning procedures, if any, combined with available valves, materials and linings/sealings, surface treatments, checked against lifetime cost, including operation and maintenance cost.
Most of the time we can skip most of this, but time and again it is sensible to remind oneself that this is what it is all about.
Advice: Always check the origin and reason for the valve specification if something does nut rhyme! The specifications is very often based on a single persons opinion, and this person is not always an updated valve expert!
(...for larger valves in this case I would have considered a high quality stainless spindle, non wetted, combined with high-quality valve lining, and disc of ductile iron, completely protected with suitable compound.)