Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Effective Compaction Depth

Effective Compaction Depth

Effective Compaction Depth


General request for opinions on the following:

I work for a local geotech firm that services areas in the upper to lower coastal plains of SC. We typically run into sites that require the upper XX amount of cleaner sands (SP to SP-SM/C) to be "densified in-place". My general thought on this is that this is really only applicable for sites that have soils below or near optimum especially for soils dirtier than 12% fines.

Am I crazy to think that a contractor can essentially moisture condition (flood clean sands) areas that we need to consolidate and vibratory roll in soils with 26 ton smooth drum then back check the "densification" process with a DCP and proofrolling? For an example of 3 feet below grade, is it a pipe dream to think I will get compactive effort at this depth? Subgrade soils are predominantly a medium SP-SM below optimum supporting very light loads.

Thanks J

RE: Effective Compaction Depth

To answer this question about compaction about compaction at depths more than the "layer" go out to the job with density testing equipment, dig down and run tests as you dig. I once did this doubting a contractor being able to compact 3 feet. He won the bet.

RE: Effective Compaction Depth

10-4. Thanks oldestguy. Just wondering what kind of soil were you in? Specifically, roughly how much passing the 200?

RE: Effective Compaction Depth

one of my first jobs that i did all the field tech work on used a processed fill that was a clean SP. The surface always jostled around during compaction effort even with water but the lower regions were always confined and compacting. After a few failed tests and scratching our heads, we bladed in and tested the lift below. Found a whole lot more compaction. Finished the whole job testing the 2nd to last lift all the way up. we had a smooth drum, a water truck, and a sheepsfoot. The lift would get spread, then the sheepsfoot ride-on would hit it, then the water truck would soak it, then the smooth drum would finish before next lift. I doubt the smooth drum was even really necessary, but it was there and the guy was working.

i wouldn't make a practice of using a DCP to check for compaction on new projects. it is too easy to pin the blame if something bad happens and project specs rarely recognize the DCP test. the DCP is more of a tool when you're doing forensic work when the test has no effect on the quality of the work. or the DCP can be used to supplement the compaction testing program.

RE: Effective Compaction Depth

hey thanks for the response darthsoilsguy2

Most definitely understand what you are saying about the use of a dcp. I'll probably just beat a proctor and do test pits/tubes/sand cone to verify at some frequency and dcp in betweeen etc. Man that is wild you were using a sheeps in clean sand, I've never seen that before!


RE: Effective Compaction Depth

yeah, conventional wisdom is smooth drum for sands and gravels and is certainly true for well graded materials. In the case of that SP the feet divots did help with allowing the uniform dispersal of moisture deep into the lift and having a drivable surface for the water truck to quickly deliver the water to it

RE: Effective Compaction Depth

darthsoilsguy2 - I concur and have posted similarly in a number of past threads. I would test the surface layer - if it passed, ok; if not, dig down 4 inches or so and test again. But the best specification would be in materials like you have to actually say to test the lower layer. This is how we did 600 mm of sand filter recently even using a 1-tonne tag-along.

RE: Effective Compaction Depth

On the job where we checked compaction next to a foundation wall it likely was sand, probably well graded.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now
The Great Project Profitability Debate
A/E firms have a great opportunity to lead the world into the future, but the industry’s greatest asset—real-time data—is sitting wasted in clunky, archaic ERP platforms. Learn how real-time, fully interactive dashboards in a modern ERP allow you to unlock data that will shape the future of the world. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close