Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Not Crossing Dimensions

Not Crossing Dimensions

Not Crossing Dimensions

I have a few rectangular shaped components in a Polar Array (corners touching) Thant I need to dimension. Unfortunately there are other components outside of the circle, so I'm going to have to dimension them inside, causing the dimensions to cross each other. Obviously this is bad form & I'd like to stop it happening.

Don't know if this is possible though, so does anyone have any suggestions?

Attached is a simplified version of my file, including some annotations to (hopefully) make what I'm trying to do clearer.

P.S. I hope it is obvious I don't want to have to explode the dimension in order to do this.

RE: Not Crossing Dimensions

Dimension one 1200 length on the inside of the arc. Write "6x 1200" or "1200 TYP" as the dim (actually, "2x <>") and be done with it. If they're all the same general rectangular unit, you shouldn't have to tell them how big each piece is - just how to orient/place subsequent units.

/edit/ More info about the nature of the part may result in more refined suggestions, such as whether or not it's practical to call out an inscribed arc radius to define orientation or not.

RE: Not Crossing Dimensions

To be honest, I've over simplified, they are not all 12, some are 24 and sadly, I am being asked to dimension them individually whilst at the same time being complained to that the dimensions overlap.

Unfortunately I cannot give you any more information than I have. I don't think it would help anyway. If it is not possible then it's not possible, I'm sure I've seen it done though.

RE: Not Crossing Dimensions

It's not possible to create dimensions as you presented them with standard Autocad objects in any way I know of.

You can "oblique" a dimension in the DIMEDIT command but it will shift BOTH extension lines by the same angle, in the same direction - it will not allow you to camber the extension lines inward or outward. It only ITALICIZES the extension lines, so to speak.

RE: Not Crossing Dimensions

My only suggestion is to stagger the dimensions and use DimBreak.

RE: Not Crossing Dimensions

Damn, I was hoping this was just something I'd missed.

Nevermind, they can just deal with the Dims crossing each other.

Cheers anyway.

RE: Not Crossing Dimensions

Been in a similar situation before. It also irritated the heck out of me as it does your coworker/boss/whomever, apparently. Sometimes it sucks but it's necessary.

RE: Not Crossing Dimensions

1)One way would be to use ordinate dimensions, but the dimension values may be a little weird.
2)If the dimensions are all similar, just dimension one feature and just use TYP as typical.
3) Use a table of to the side and dimension each feature with leaders that reference the table.
These are all simple solutions, please let me know if you use any of them.
Simplicity is OUR job.

RE: Not Crossing Dimensions

I would place the dimensions inside the rectangle; probably snapped to the midpoint of the short edge for your example.

RE: Not Crossing Dimensions

Dimensions inside the rectangle might be an acceptable option, you could add a caterpillar on the edge of the rectangular object to simulate a partial hatch.

Another option, you can always make the dimensions and then explode them, and shape them as you see fit. Obviously this renders the dimensions 'non-updating' and could be completely against your rules, and is generally bad form anyways.

A further option is the same as the second, but add the mid-line dimensions on a 'non-print' layer and make them into a reference parameter that you then reference in the text of the 'false' dimensions.

And then the other option, if you have only two or three different dimensions, dimension the first one [ 1200 TYP, Three (3) Places ] and put a single hash line across the border [ / ] of each similar, dimension the second [ 2400 TYP, Two (2) Places ] and put (2) simple hash lines [ // ] across the border of each similar, and so on. Basically indicating each unique feature in a coordinated fashion, notation also works (see note 1).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close