Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

solid-mesh contact Femap-Nastran

solid-mesh contact Femap-Nastran

solid-mesh contact Femap-Nastran

hello all,
I am trying to calculate a foil which consists of a laminated carbon fibre skin on a foam core.
I have meshed the skin with 2D shell elements and the core with 3D solid elements
I have tediously made all the contact regions and connectors using a glued property
the static analysis doesn't work "excessive pivot ratios" and when I force it with PARAM,BAILOUT,-1, the total translation contour shows local peaks which shouldn't be there
When I run a similar model without the foam core and just the skins it works fine so I'm guessing the problem is in my connection between the shell and solid elements.

any hints on something that is often done wrong in this case ?

note: I have built the geometry in rhino, the foam core is a closed polysurface and the skins are open surfaces of the exact same shape as the core. the foil will be built on a female mould so I have offset the laminate properties so that they extend towards the inside of the foil, that means when you turn thickness on, they overlap on the 3d solid elements. Is it a source of error ?

thanks in advance

RE: solid-mesh contact Femap-Nastran


You can use mesh / Edge Members command to create a skin (plate elements) for the core you meshed using 3D elements.
Then define the correct property for the skin.

No need for glued contact for this study.

For the elements overlap you can define an offset for the skin elements.


Seifeddine Naffoussi, Stress Engineer

RE: solid-mesh contact Femap-Nastran

thanks, I´ll try that, but the problem is that my skins have complicated degressive layups so the surfaces are broken down in a multitude of small surfaces, to which I assigned all the different attributes before meshing.

RE: solid-mesh contact Femap-Nastran

Hi all
I have made some progress on glued contacts, my models run correctly now and I have a question regarding post processing: Femap with Nastran proposes results 253 to 265, glue traction, glue force, glue moment.
Can somone explain to me what they represent, and what units are used ?
do they mean the same thing for surface/surface and edge/surface contacts ?
I have searched the nastran guide + google without any luck for the moment...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
Research Report - Simulation-Driven Design for SOLIDWORKS Users
In this engineering.com research report, we discuss the rising role of simulation and the paradigm shift commonly called the democratization of simulation. In particular, we focus on how SOLIDWORKS users can take advantage of simulation-driven design through two analysis tools: SOLIDWORKS Simulation and 3DEXPERIENCE WORKS. Download Now
White Paper - Industry 4.0 and the Future of Engineering Education
With industries becoming more automated, more tech-driven and more complex, engineers need to keep their skills and knowledge up to date in order to stay on top of this wave—and to be prepared for the Industry 4.0 future. The University of Cincinnati offers two online Master of Engineering degree programs designed specifically for practicing engineers. Download Now
eBook - The Design Gridlock Manifesto
In this eBook, you’ll learn 6 ways old CAD technology slows your company down and hear how design teams have put those problems to rest. “The Design Gridlock Manifesto” shares first-hand modern CAD experiences from 15 companies around the world. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close