×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Best practices for FEA connector modeling.

Best practices for FEA connector modeling.

Best practices for FEA connector modeling.

(OP)
Hello,

I'm using SW simulation as analysis software for a piece aerospace hardware that will have a lot of oversight on our analysis.

What is the best practice for modeling fasteners in an assembly with up to 20 bolts? I am not interested in resolving bolt forces/stresses (these will be derived and analyzed by hand) but in the stresses in the components. In particular I would like to replicate the use of a CBUSH Nastran element as I know this is the practice used by the reviewer.

I do not wish to solve contact and instead would like to invest computational resources in mesh resolution.

Thanks.

RE: Best practices for FEA connector modeling.

If I got your question right, you are aiming at the component stresses being correct and not concerned about the loads that will come from your CBUSH elements.
You might want to have in plane & axial stiffness values calculated by Huth's Method and K=AE/L

And again for your CBUSH elements, you might want to put values around 10^8 rotational degrees of freedom that are in-plane of your sheet metal. The out of plane rotational degree of freedom should be around 100 to be conservative (at some level - you should really check this part depending on your assembly - but 100 is kind of standard for stress models).

Anything related to especially Solidworks, I don't know much. Just used Solidworks-Cosmosmotion-Cosmosworks combo in 2008 for a project, never modeled fasteners.

Hope above explanation helps at some level.

Spaceship!!
Aerospace Engineer, M.Sc. / Aircraft Stress Engineer

RE: Best practices for FEA connector modeling.

(OP)
Thanks!

I have not used Nastran but have viewed a lot of reports from it --hence why I'm attempting to replicate some of its best practices in sw.

One thing I never understood on the CBUSH use as a fastener is why it is ok not to consider the bearing stiffness? If we define axial stiffness as AE/L this works very well for when the bolt is in tension, but would be inaccurate for when the joint in compression. Can you explain why this acceptable practice?

On a side note, I think it would be very useful to have an element that had two stiffness for modeling fasteners -one for positive strains and one for negatives strains. While this would be technically nonlinear in reality would only require two iterations (first to solve for strain direction, second to solve with stiffness selected based on strain directions in first study). I suppose I could do this manually or write a script. Unfortunately solidworks doesn't let you scripts for things like this... time to ask for better software ...

RE: Best practices for FEA connector modeling.

Doesn't it rather depend on what effects you are trying to model? CBUSH for a bolt is rather primitive if you are looking at fatigue near the bolt, but will work fine for modal frequencies etc.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: Best practices for FEA connector modeling.

mfritze
When you have a bolt in compression, there will actually be no compressive load on your bolt as it will be transferred to the contacting faces of 2 parts in an assembly.
The general practice in aerospace is that the compressive loads are assumed as zero. They are not accounted for any fastener analysis. However, the resultant or in-plane shear loads on a fastener are used for fastener analysis for both compressive and tensile cases.

GregLocock
The CBUSH forces are again used for fatigue analysis - where as you say is a little more primitive than the automotive 3D hex fatigue models (with pre-tension, contacts &/or nonlinear geometry/material). But in the end, they are mostly on planar or very symmetrical geometries that are mostly as regular as possible (square, triangle etc).
However, in automotive, for example on a bumper assembly, you will have so much irregular shaped (trimmed composite shapes in Patran) that the aerospace methodologies don't come in handy for automotive parts.
In aerospace, they are pretty much used in almost every joint as CBUSH elements and all fatigue, damage tolerance calculations are made based on those models most of the time. Thus, it is a well accepted practice until we have supercomputers that will enable us model "everything" with hex and tria meshes....

Spaceship!!
Aerospace Engineer, M.Sc. / Aircraft Stress Engineer

RE: Best practices for FEA connector modeling.

mfritze,

SOLIDWORKS Simulation does allow for scripting through the API, it just isn't well-documented. However, if you know how to create macros and use the SOLIDWORKS API documentation there are ways for certain things.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Implementing a Multi-Domain System
IoT systems are multi-domain designs that often require AMS, Digital, RF, photonics and MEMS elements within the system. Tanner EDA provides an integrated, top-down design flow for IoT design that supports all these design domains. Learn more about key solutions that the Tanner design flow offers for successful IoT system design and verification. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close