Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


notional loads direct analysis method

notional loads direct analysis method

notional loads direct analysis method

dear experts,
I want to ask about notional loads
first in direct analysis method according to AISC360-05 or AISC360-10 I have to used notional loads which equal 0.002 from gravity loads and apply it for each story level ,but there is condition in code where the ratio of maximum second-order drift to
maximum first-order drift (both determined for LRFD load combinations or 1.6
times ASD load combinations, equal to or less than (1.7 in aisc 360-10) &(1.5 in aisc 360-05)

my question is when I add the notional load to asd combination I must multiply the combinations with 1.6 or not
thx in advance

RE: notional loads direct analysis method

Yes, your notional loads would also be increased. The idea here is to amplify the second order effects (i.e. P-Delta) so that it is on the level with what you would get if you were using LRFD load combinations.

Just don't do it TWICE. Meaning, you do the following 1.6*(0.002*(DL+LL)), not 1.6*(0.002*1.6*(DL+LL)).

RE: notional loads direct analysis method

Joshplum, thanks a lot for your helpful reply
so what I will do in ASD combination with notional load will be as follow
(DL+LL+1.6*(0.002*(DL+LL))...is this ok or not?

also i have another question
i always use ASD in my design but i don't know which will be more economic in our design ASD or LRFD ?
thanks in advance.

RE: notional loads direct analysis method

Actually, you have to factor up BOTH the gravity load and the lateral loads. So, it would be something like the following:

Gravity load = 1.6*(DL+LL)
Lateral / Notional Load = 1.6*0.002*(DL+LL)

Then your total results can get divided by 1.6.

If you're using an analysis program then check to see whether this is automatically accounted for. I can speak for others, but in RISA (the analysis company I work for), if you request a P-Delta analysis and your steel code check is set to AISC 13th or 14th editions, then the program will automatically handle the 1.6 factors internally. I would imagine that most of the other commercially successful programs would do basically the same thing.

RE: notional loads direct analysis method

I really appreciate your help
thanks a lot joshplum

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - The Criticality of the E/E Architecture
Modern vehicles are highly sophisticated systems incorporating electrical, electronic, software and mechanical components. Mechanical systems are giving way to advanced software and electronic devices, driving automakers to innovate and differentiate their vehicles via the electric and electronic (E/E) architecture. As the pace of change accelerates, automotive companies need to evolve their development processes to deliver and maximize the value of these architectures. Download Now
White Paper - Model Based Engineering for Wire Harness Manufacturing
Modern cars, trucks, and other vehicles feature an ever-increasing number of sophisticated electrical and electronic features, placing a larger burden on the wiring harness that enables these new features. As complexity rises, current harness manufacturing methods are struggling to keep pace due to manual data exchanges and the inability to capture tribal knowledge. A model-based wire harness manufacturing engineering flow automates data exchange and captures tribal knowledge through design rules to help harness manufacturers improve harness quality and boost efficiency. Download Now
White Paper - Modeling and Optimizing Wire Harness Costs for Variation Complexity
This paper will focus on the quantification of the complexity related costs in harness variations in order to model them, allowing automated algorithms to optimize for these costs. A number of real world examples will be provided as well. Since no two businesses are alike, it is the aim of this paper to provide the foundational knowledge and methodology so the reader can assess their own business to model how variation complexity costs affect their business. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close