×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

1D beam to 2D plate connection

1D beam to 2D plate connection

1D beam to 2D plate connection

(OP)
thread1234-338079: Railing Model

Hi all,

I therad mentioned above the connection 1D beam to 2D plate is done by RBE2 element.

But if end of my beam element is touching my plate element can I force Femap to have coincident node there and no RBE2 connection? Just like when I have 2 beam elements at 90 degrees with coincident node.

Brgds,
Wnuczko

RE: 1D beam to 2D plate connection

Hi Wnuczko,
yes you can but keep in mind that the nodes of plate elements doesn't have the DOF R3 (the drilling one, rotational degree of freedom along the perprendicular axis of the element), so your beam element would be free to rotate along its axis. Thta is why a 1D element is connected with RBE to a 2D one.

RE: 1D beam to 2D plate connection

(OP)
Thank you crostolo, but I see my approach is completely wrong.

I see having 1D and 2D elements in connection is not a good idea for checking what is the situation at connection area. Look picture attached.

My RBE2 spider is too small. Would be better to select the nodes that are close to the square tube walls. But then changing the profile enforces to change the spider again - not very efficient.

Do you guys have ani other idea than using only 2D plates and add them to non manifold?

Rgds,

RE: 1D beam to 2D plate connection

i think the best approach is to model the tube as 2D elements (rather than as a 1D beam).

how does the square tube actually interface with the plate ? welded along perimeter ??

if you must keep 1D beam, then your RBE should come to the footprint of the square tube, and you should have different nodes for the beam on differenst sides of teh plate (so the load goes from the 1D beam thru the RBE across the plate thru the 2nd RBE into the second 1D beam)

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - 10 Reasons to Choose CATIA on the Cloud
To compete in today’s fast-paced and competitive market, smaller and newer firms need a powerful platform that will enable them to compete with bigger players, without the heavy investments needed in computer hardware, software and personnel. Download Now
White Paper - Smart Manufacturing for Electronics
This white paper describes a transformative approach to electronics manufacturing made possible by the addition of Mentor Graphics to the Siemens family. It describes a completely digitalized strategy that supports both printed circuit board (PCB) and mechanical design and manufacturing, uniting the entire product lifecycle – from idea and production to customers and back. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close