Bonded doubler repairs to composites, carbon or glass must be justified considering the failure case, i.e depending on the structure classification the component must be able to carry limit or ultimate loading without the repair. Does the same hold true for metal to metal repair?
I mean bonded doublers on composite components are considered “cosmetic” or “non structural”. Is this the same for metal to metal bonds?
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
Material selection can be a guessing game, but it doesn’t have to be. If you’re an engineer looking to quantitatively analyze a material to determine if its properties fit your application, then you’ll need to be ready with a wide range of facts. Download Now
Teach pendants are a critical part of the factory environment as they act as the human/machine interface for industrial robots. But since teach pendants are handheld, they are under a greater risk of damage due to falls. Download Now
Product development in most companies requires a sequential iterative process to come up with the right product. It can be time-consuming and time is a resource that is in the shortest supply. Download Now