Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


A question about Example 7-1 of CT Trenching and shoring manual

A question about Example 7-1 of CT Trenching and shoring manual

A question about Example 7-1 of CT Trenching and shoring manual

Hi, I am trying to design a braced soldier pile wall with the help of CT manual, but I seem to have problem finding the required depth of embedment of piles. According to the manual I need to take moments about brace location on the pile to calculate embedment depth using a factor of safety of 1.3. Doing that leads to a third degree equation which gives only negative roots for D. I checked the example 7-1 of the manual (page 7-14) and put M_R=1.3M_D on page 7-18 which in turn gave me this equation


which also gives negative values for D and off coarse totally different from what the manual suggested which is


I checked the procedure before equation above and they all seem to be right but putting M_R=1.3M_D just doesn't give D^3+18.7D^2-114.53D-223.98=0.
I just wonder if there is something wrong with the procedure suggested by the CT manual or I'm just too stupid to do basic calculation :)

I found a link to mentioned example here (http://files.engineering.com/download.aspx?folder=...)
would you please take a look at page 7-18 and help me with that example. Thanks.

RE: A question about Example 7-1 of CT Trenching and shoring manual

What the example in the manual does not make clear is that when you set M_R equal to 1.3 M_D, the sign on M_R is negative. This is because the sum of the moments equals zero (M_R + M_D = 0) for the stable condition. When you move M_R to the other side of the equation, it is negative. So when you solver for D you are actual solving the equation -M_R=1.3 M_D. When you do that, you get the results in the example.

RE: A question about Example 7-1 of CT Trenching and shoring manual

Thank you Panars, that solved my problem... Seems that I have forgotten simple equilibrium equations :)

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now
White Paper - Are all 3D printed metals the same?
With so many different 3D printing metal systems and processes today, how can you know exactly what you’re getting? Today, there are several different methods for manufacturing 3D printed metal components with their own strengths and limits. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close