Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Overtuning Moment of each upper shell course

Overtuning Moment of each upper shell course

Overtuning Moment of each upper shell course

My client requires the we determine the seismic overtuning moment and corresponding stresses at the bottom of each upper Shell as API E. (see also E.6.1.5). do you know special analysis for determine seismic overtuning moment and corresponding stresses al the bottom of each upper Shell course.? We dont want increase the calculated thickness. On the other hand the customer does not agree with the linear approximation indicated by E.6.1.5.

RE: Overtuning Moment of each upper shell course

First off, I'd try just using the base moment and if that calculated out okay, there's no reason to go into any more complexity. Note that for an unanchored tank, you wouldn't have the stress increase due to partial uplift that you do in the first ring.

You could take the impulsive and convective loads and heights and just calculate the moment at the bottom of each course using the distance from those loads to the bottom of the course in question. That may seem like a gross approximation, but then again, the seismic loading on the tank is based on that same gross approximation.

I'm sure some of the seismic references give more detail on this, but it's usually not necessary to go into that much detail. But you might google up Robert Wozniak's paper that was used as the basis of Appendix E, I think he has a lot of the formulas in the back of that paper. The TID 7024 document that's referenced likely either has that, or information to derive it, as well. There is a "revised" or "corrected" TID 7024, which is the one you want.

If I remember right, on the taller tanks, the formulas are set up assuming the top part is a separate little tank that sloshes, and the bottom part is just there as impulsive mass. IE, for a tall narrow tank, you could move up 8' or 16', and treat the tank above there as a separate tank of reduced height.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close