Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

ACI minimum reinforcement at zero moment

ACI minimum reinforcement at zero moment

ACI minimum reinforcement at zero moment

Hi all,
I was designing a beam using RSA when w faced a huge minimum area of reinforcement at zero moment (attached screen shot)
I didn't find any clue in ACI mentioning this huge increase of As,min .
the beam dimension is 90x30 cm. Can someone clarify me why Im getting this issue?

RE: ACI minimum reinforcement at zero moment

as per ACI318-08 item#10.5.3 u don't need to apply the minimum reinforcement if u put at least one third greater than that required by analysis

RE: ACI minimum reinforcement at zero moment

thank you for your reply,
section 10.5.3 is under minimum reinforcement of flexural member. In my case, due to axial load and zero moment, the minimum area of reinforcement is taken the same as the column (1% x section) .
my question is:
1-this section can be used in my case?
2-I am using RSA for my analysis, (http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-ana...)
kindly check the forum and especially the sentence "If you consider the axial force as small enough to be neglected just exclude it from the analysis and run reinforcement design for pure bending. "
what part of ACI-318 Talks about this statement?

I really appreciate your help because no one gave me a clear answer about this issue:s

RE: ACI minimum reinforcement at zero moment

sorry i don't use RSA in the analysis but , the important question how didn't u find any straining action on your element , if you don't have any vertical load the self weight will be enough to create moment , also Asmin. as per ACI318 item 10.5 will be 30 x 85 x .003323 =8.97 cm2 (4T18) it’s not huge bars

RE: ACI minimum reinforcement at zero moment

RSA gave me a minimum area of reinforcement 21.68 (1% of section) (check attachment). when I asked about it in RSA forum the response was :
"It is due to applying Amin provisions of ACI for elements under pure tension (it is in the location where bending moment is zero and tension force exists). If you consider the axial force as small enough to be neglected just exclude it from the analysis and run reinforcement design for pure bending. "

My main question is there any ACI provision that we can use to neglect axial load?
ACI318-08 item#10.5.3 can be used in this case?

note: load applied (Self weight -Z direction , LL +Z direction)

RE: ACI minimum reinforcement at zero moment

This sounds like a software defect. There will NOT be zero flexure, despite a theoretical computation. The defining issue is whether the member (not the section) acts primarily as an axial member or a flexural member. Also, once redistribution is applied, the "zero moment" point shifts, removing any true point of zero moment.
ACI 318-14, in reference to the effects of combined axial and moment, says:


R9.5.2.2 Beams resisting significant axial forces require consideration of the combined effects of axial forces and moments. These beams are not required to satisfy the provi- sions of Chapter 10, but are required to satisfy the additional requirements for ties or spirals defined in Table For slender beams with significant axial loads, consider- ation should be given to slenderness effects as required for columns in 6.2.6.
I would suggest that there would be need for reinforcement top and bottom in sections subject to significant axial.

RE: ACI minimum reinforcement at zero moment

Thank you TXSstructural,

the member resist only the loads mentioned before with a one end fixed and other pinned.
as for ACI318-14 provisions the Word "Significant" is defined by who? by what formula? what is the limit of axial load in order to consider it as significant or not?

RE: ACI minimum reinforcement at zero moment

The provision shown is commentary to go with the code provision which refers to 22.4 (Axial strength or combined flexural and axial strength.) I think the idea is that assessment is required in all cases, and "significant" means that the axial load changes the stresses such that the basic moment computation is no longer conservative.
Obviously, "significant" would not be used in the code, only the commentary.

RE: ACI minimum reinforcement at zero moment

What I understand from your statement above that its all about engineering judgment to neglect axial load or not.

RE: ACI minimum reinforcement at zero moment

Yes, but numerically you could calculate the combined effects for each section and each load case to confirm your judgement. This would be inefficient for members with light axial loads unless the software does it for you (which would be trivial and necessary for good software.) If the axial load is tension, you would need to examine reinforcement stresses and shear and torsion (since shear cracking is principally a tension phenomenon.) If the axial is compression, you would mostly be evaluating the added stresses when moment results in maximal concrete compression.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - How ESI is Helping Move New Medical Device Product to Market Quicker & More Cost Effic
Early Supplier Involvement has long been a strategy employed by manufacturers to produce innovative products. Now, it almost seems like a necessity. Because decisions made in the design phase can positively affect product quality and costs, this can help add value to OEM bottom lines. This white paper will discuss many facets of ESI, including why it’s so valuable today, what challenges limit the benefits of ESI, how cost is impacted, and more. Download Now
White Paper - Moving to a Driverless Future
This white paper describes what we see as the best practices to support a sustainable engineering process for autonomous vehicle design. It exposes how to use simulation and testing in common frameworks to enable design exploration, verification and validation for the development of autonomous cars at a system, software and full-vehicle level to drive a mature product development process for automated driving. Download Now
Research Report - How Engineers are Using Remote Access
Remote access enables engineers to work from anywhere provided they have an internet connection. We surveyed our audience of engineers, designers and product managers to learn how they use remote access within their organizations. We wanted to know which industries have adopted remote access, which software they are using, and what features matter most. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close