×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

incorrect force measurement

thread823-391814

incorrect force measurement

incorrect force measurement

(OP)
Hi,

I am doing a simulation with Simulink (with sampling time 1ms) and Adams.
This simulation is about a quadruped robot running on the flat ground with rolling foot, like Rhex robot.
This model is about 10kg and runs under 1 to 1.5m/s in the simulation.
The variation of potential energy is minimized, because the body of the model is moving parallel to the flat ground.
However, when I try to measure the normal force from the ground. The total force summed from four legs is much less than its weight, which should be roughly equal to its weight. This situation becomes worse, if the robot running in higher speed.
I might set something incorrect, and I'll appreciate it, if I can get any help about this.

RE: incorrect force measurement

(OP)
Thanks for your reply.
I found that the circles(step file) I imported, which roll on the ground during the simulation, are not considered as circles.
So I used the cylinders directly in the adams instead. The situation has been improved a lot, but the normal force still reduces when the running speed increases.
I guess the reason might be the calculation of the contact force.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login

Resources

White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now
White Paper - Are all 3D printed metals the same?
With so many different 3D printing metal systems and processes today, how can you know exactly what you’re getting? Today, there are several different methods for manufacturing 3D printed metal components with their own strengths and limits. Download Now
Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close