Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Related Articles


Lightly Loaded Concrete Moment Frame

Lightly Loaded Concrete Moment Frame

Lightly Loaded Concrete Moment Frame

I think this is a simple question, just want to get an opinion because I haven't run across this before. I have a concrete moment frame that supports a small elevated platform and it is in earthquake country where Chapter 21 of ACI applies (special reinforced concrete moment frame). Chapter 21.5 is for flexural members of SMFs (typically beams) and 21.6 is for members subjected to bending and axial loads (typically columns). However, my columns have a light enough load that they don't meet the minimum axial load required by that section to be considered a column. Do I just follow the design requirements for flexural members? There are provisions in 21.6 for columns that try to ensure strong column-weak beam type of action. Do I ignore those requirements and others with regard to tie spacing etc. because it is lightly loaded (vertically)? I think that is what the code is telling me to do. I would therefore just design it with the minimum steel and ties as if it were a beam, but it seems weird to do so. Thoughts?

RE: Lightly Loaded Concrete Moment Frame

I see your dilemma. For a special moment frame, your columns need to resist axial forces consistent with the development of over strength plastic hinges in the beams. Is that axial load still very small? Usually it is significant. If there's any way out of employing a special moment frame, that's what I would do.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Lightly Loaded Concrete Moment Frame

I guess looking at the intermediate concrete moment frame, it is written more explicitly that any member that doesn't meet the minimum axial load, should be treated like a beam (in regards to minimum reinforcement, etc.). I will probably switch to using the intermediate moment frame design. Thanks.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close