×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

52CrMoV4 1.7701 vs 5160 vs 6150 for spring material
2

52CrMoV4 1.7701 vs 5160 vs 6150 for spring material

52CrMoV4 1.7701 vs 5160 vs 6150 for spring material

(OP)
All,

I am looking for the pros and cons comparing 52CrMoV4 1.7701, 5160, and 6150 for spring application.

Currently have a requirement for 5,000 minimum cycle life, with stress levels at 136,000 lbs/in^2 at the top of its working deflection (bar dia of 2.687"). Possible saline conditions. Temperatures from 34F-151F.

Thanks in advance,

mgh

RE: 52CrMoV4 1.7701 vs 5160 vs 6150 for spring material

2
5160 pro: lowest cost
5160 con: lowest hardenability (likely cannot through harden 2.687" bar), no vanadium to resist grain coarsening during hot deformation

6150 pro: lower cost than 52CrMoV4, sufficient hardenability for this application, contains vanadium to resist grain coarsening during hot deformation
6150 con: higher cost than 5160

52CrMoV4 pro: highest hardenability, highest resistance to hardness/strength loss due to elevated temperature exposure, contains vanadium to resist grain coarsening during hot deformation
52CrMoV4 con: highest cost

RE: 52CrMoV4 1.7701 vs 5160 vs 6150 for spring material

(OP)
Thanks for the helpful response CoryPad.

I assume all three have the same chemical compatibility in saline conditions?

-M

RE: 52CrMoV4 1.7701 vs 5160 vs 6150 for spring material

Yes, they all will corrode equally in saline environments. Corrosion protection (e.g. non-electrolytic zinc-rich coating, cathodic electrocoating) is recommended.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close