Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Life factor for long life in ISO 6336-2 standard

Life factor for long life in ISO 6336-2 standard

Life factor for long life in ISO 6336-2 standard

The ISO 6336-2 standard mentions that the life factor for long life should range between 0.85 and 1; where 1 stands for optimum conditions and 0.85 stands for critical service where pitting lust be minimal. Does anyone know why 0.85 is the minimum value? can you take a lower value like 0.7 or 0.6? and how to decide that?

RE: Life factor for long life in ISO 6336-2 standard

the numbers / values are based on the specified standard reference test gears, having run (long life) up to 10 exp10 cycles. Referenced to an optimum condition and a cycle limit of e.g. 2x 10 exp6, 5x 10 exp7 or 10 exp9 , the respective decrease in load bearing capacity versus non - optimum conditions amounted to -15%, this is then the limit of 0.85 given in the table 2 as well as figure 6.
However, non - optimum conditions are in themselves already demanding a minimum of technical environment, and then there's fast running gears that may exceed the 10 by 10 cycles limit. For those circumstances, you need to find additional input / do your specific tests, see chapter 5.4.

RE: Life factor for long life in ISO 6336-2 standard

Thank you RolMec for your answer. Just to double check I understood you correctly, if I am deriving an S-N curve for a new material/heat-treatment that was not included in the ISO standard and I got a value of the life factor below 0.85 for long life, should I accept it?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close