Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

comparaison between analytical methods

comparaison between analytical methods

comparaison between analytical methods

So i was discussing with an expert on slope stability, and he stated that he uses bishop methods all the time .
When i argued that using it on transnational slides is not a good idea , he then answered that it can be viewed as a cercular failure with an infinite or very big radius .
What are your comments about this ?

RE: comparaison between analytical methods

There are slight improvements that can be made by applying one hand method or another to a given problem (based on soil type, geometry).. As I recall from some papers I read during my research, Janbu might be the most "accurate" of the hand or spreadsheet applicable solutions.

That said, for practical design purposes, this is largely irrelevant -- the factor of safety you'll need to apply will cover the slight variation. The counter case would be if you need to predict a failure point (rather than just determining a safe non-failure solution). In that case, you'd want to try to pick the method best suited to your site.

I also tend towards Bishop's method -- reasonable results, and simple to implement.

RE: comparaison between analytical methods

If you are only analizing homogenous slopes, then yes you could use Bishops method with a very large radius to get close to the results from a wedge type failure. However, if you are working in most real world situations where the soils are no homogenous, then you need a method that can handle different shaped failure surfaces.

I use Spencer's method. This is the method recommended by the USACE and is supported by many current slope stability software packages.

Mike Lambert

RE: comparaison between analytical methods

thank you all

RE: comparaison between analytical methods

Its depend on the type of slope you r analyzing. Let me know type of slope and conditions please.

Meantime see following paper if you fin it interest.


RE: comparaison between analytical methods

Rasika or it Razika ^^
As i stated its just a general question , just an argument with an old man who believe that Bishop's method can be applied in every single case. I wasn't trying to look intelligent or something but i tested him with a delicate question : When mudflow or earthflow is initiated what kind of method should we be using ? and he stuttered for the answer was fluid mechanics :D

Thanks for the document

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close