Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Bolted Joints - Recommended Norms ?

Bolted Joints - Recommended Norms ?

Bolted Joints - Recommended Norms ?

What aerospace norms()or references do people use/recommend for detailed stressing of bolted joints ?
Which are the most used in aerospace circles?

Thank you
Mr. F.

RE: Bolted Joints - Recommended Norms ?

Bruhn, Niu, NACA, standard texts, any bolt text (aerospace bolts aren't especially "special")

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Bolted Joints - Recommended Norms ?

FAQ725-600: What are good fastener references?

Some specific to aerospace not included in the FAQ above:


RE: Bolted Joints - Recommended Norms ?

In addition to what r1957 and CoryPad have mentioned.

There are "best practices" that should be employed when installing any larger cluster-pattern of fasteners in primary or even lighter secondary structure. these practices ensure even settling of parts together resulting in best/optimum fastener load distributions and minimal structural distortion. IF structure is assembled without employing these "best practices" then really odd assembly problems will surface, or in-service premature failure are highly likely.

These best practices are especially critical when assemblying structure with various type fasteners [solid/blind rivets, bolts/nuts, lock-bolts and/or Hi-Loks, blind-bolts, etc] and fay surface sealant.

I haven't got time to note these specific practices, right now.

Regards, Wil Taylor

Trust Me! I'm an engineer!

Trust - But Verify!

We believe to be true what we prefer to be true.

For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible.

Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant รป "Orion"

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close