Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Bolted Joints - Recommended Norms ?

Bolted Joints - Recommended Norms ?

Bolted Joints - Recommended Norms ?

What aerospace norms()or references do people use/recommend for detailed stressing of bolted joints ?
Which are the most used in aerospace circles?

Thank you
Mr. F.

RE: Bolted Joints - Recommended Norms ?

Bruhn, Niu, NACA, standard texts, any bolt text (aerospace bolts aren't especially "special")

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Bolted Joints - Recommended Norms ?

FAQ725-600: What are good fastener references?

Some specific to aerospace not included in the FAQ above:


RE: Bolted Joints - Recommended Norms ?

In addition to what r1957 and CoryPad have mentioned.

There are "best practices" that should be employed when installing any larger cluster-pattern of fasteners in primary or even lighter secondary structure. these practices ensure even settling of parts together resulting in best/optimum fastener load distributions and minimal structural distortion. IF structure is assembled without employing these "best practices" then really odd assembly problems will surface, or in-service premature failure are highly likely.

These best practices are especially critical when assemblying structure with various type fasteners [solid/blind rivets, bolts/nuts, lock-bolts and/or Hi-Loks, blind-bolts, etc] and fay surface sealant.

I haven't got time to note these specific practices, right now.

Regards, Wil Taylor

Trust Me! I'm an engineer!

Trust - But Verify!

We believe to be true what we prefer to be true.

For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible.

Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant û "Orion"

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close