×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

minimum less than.

minimum less than.

minimum less than.

(OP)

Quote (OSHA 1910.269 Appendix E referring to face shields)

The arc rating must be a minimum of 4 cal/cm2 less than the estimated incident energy.

So my estimated incident energy is 30000 cal/cm^2 for example. I must subtract a minimum of 4, so to be extra super conservative I'll just subtract the whole 30000; resulting in a face shield with no arc rating at all. Right?

RE: minimum less than.

That's a very poorly worded sentence.

RE: minimum less than.

replace "minimum" with "no less than". in your case arc rating should be at least 29994, yes?

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: minimum less than.

(OP)
Did you mean 29996 perhaps?

Quote (rb1957 revision)

The arc rating must be no less than 4 cal/cm2 less than the estimated incident energy.

Still ambiguous, since no order of operations is either expressed or implied.

RE: minimum less than.

yes, and yes, but maybe "ESL" ?

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: minimum less than.

(OP)
I have no second language, EOL. Or are you referring to the OSHA author?

"The arc rating must be no less than the result after 4 cal/cm2 is subtracted from the estimated incident energy" I think expresses the intent.

RE: minimum less than.

Why would the arc rating of a face shield be required to be less than the estimated arc intensity? It should be greater than.

RE: minimum less than.

(OP)

Quote (Compositepro)

Why would the arc rating of a face shield be required to be less than the estimated arc intensity? It should be greater than.

A question I've asked in another forum. This deviates from NFPA 70E. My initial guess is that putting line workers in arc hoods in the weather was seen as too restrictive.

RE: minimum less than.

The arc rating must be a minimum of 4 cal/cm2 less than the estimated incident energy.
The arc rating is x.
The estimated incident energy is y.
The arc rating must not be less than the estimated incident energy minus 4 cal/cm2.
x >= y-4

Another way to say it,
The arch rating must be greater than or equal to the estimated incident energy minus 4 cal/cm2.

RE: minimum less than.

Essentially, x - 4 and 4 < x both translate to 4 less than x.
However the 4 < x interpretation can mean that you could end up with an impossible value (if the estimated incident energy was 0 or 1 or 2 or 3, the interpretation would yield a negative value, rendering this logic less robust than the first interpretation. You can also use human logic (such as, the first version is a safer interpretation).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close