If I understand this correctly, ALL lug nut (and lug bolt) torque specs are dry specs - that is the components are not lubricated in any way.
Adding anti-seize to any component reduces the amount of torque needed to achieve the required bolt stretch - ergo, you need to reduce the amount of torque.
Also, the problem with using excessive torque on lug nuts and bolts has more to due with double and triple the amount of torque - like using a pneumatic impact gun where it is possible to get those high values. In other words, the concern about over-torquing a lug nut due to the use of anti-seize is real but over-exaggerated - which explains why there is such a debate on the subject.
So I have taken to using anti-seize only on mating surfaces of the wheel and the hub, and avoid the lug nut area altogether. Personally, I think that is where the real problems are. OTOH, I don't live in an area with high salt usage, and I am really careful to hand start all the lug nuts when I rotate tires. - and I occasionally need to chase a thread to get it to go only smoothly by hand.
My advise to others is to do the same - avoid using anti-seize on the lugs nuts and the seats of the nut to the wheel. Hand start every nut. Chase the ones that need it. Be prepared to replace a stud or nut if it binds or gets too worn. Don't use a pneumatic impact gun for final tightening. Hand torque every nut to its final position. (This last one gets some caught out as the nut has to be turning for this to be done correctly) Use a pneumatic impact gun for REMOVAL with its huge torque generation to get the lug nuts loose.