Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Solid vs. shell element in ABAQUS

Solid vs. shell element in ABAQUS

Solid vs. shell element in ABAQUS

Dear All,

I modeled a sandwich panel in ABAQUS. The pane thickness is 4.15 inch and the facing's thickness is 0.09 in. I modeled the core and facings using solid elements (C3DR) and results were in good agreement with experimental results.
However, I am wondering is there a good arrgument to support my assumption that solid elements can be used to model the facing instead of using shell elements. I know that solid elements would require longer time to run as lots of elements are needed to maintain the aspect ratio in 3D direction. But since the work is already done and don't want to redo it to my client, your input would be appreciated.


RE: Solid vs. shell element in ABAQUS

It will depend on what you trying to achieve. "Good agreement with experimental results" is vague since we don't know what results you are trying to predict and correlate.

If you are only interested in the effects of in-plane stiffness for the facesheets, then solids would probably be fine (provided you can model it is an effective quasi-isotropic or orthotropic material). Such a case would be for the overall sandwich bending stiffness where the core is relatively thick.

But if you were trying to capture certain facesheet failure modes (such as facesheet wrinking or intracell buckling) a solid would not capture that phenomenon very well. In other words, if you are concerned about the bending stiffness of the individual facesheet, a shell may be a better option. For those modes, you may also want to properly represent the [A], [B], [D] matrices. You can not do that with a solid.


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close