I have a question on the minimum reinforcing for a special reinforced concrete shear wall. This is a small building (40'-0"x40'-0") so the loads are not very high at all. If I turn to section 21.9 - Special structural walls and coupling beams. I see table R21.9.1 - Governing Design provisions for vertical wall segments. The table specifies when to design the element as a wall or as a wall pier. So for my particular wall in question it is 10'-0" tall and 3'-8" long which gives a hw/lw ratio of 2.72. Walls are 8" thick so my lw/bw ratio is 3.67x12/8 = 5.51. So according to table R21.9.1 my wall should be designed as a wall pier per 220.127.116.11. 18.104.22.168 refers me to sections 21.6.3 - 21.6.5. Section 21.6.3 states that longitudinal reinforcing must not be less than 0.01 Ag which would require 0.01*8*12 = 0.96 sq. in. Definitely does not make sense. Section 21.9.2 is for reinforcing, so does table R21.9.1 not govern for minimum reinforcing? Section 22.214.171.124 states that minimum ratios must not be less than 0.0025 except if Vu is less than Acv*Sqrt(f'c). This is true in my case so I can refer back to section 14.3. I guess it's just confusing that table R21.9.1 seems to require much more steel instead of being listed after section 21.9.2 as an exception. Furthermore, section 126.96.36.199states that walls shall have distributed shear reinforcing providing resistance in two orthogonal direction in the plane of the wall. if hw/lw does not exceed 2, reinforcment ratio pl shall not be less than pt. So this looks like if I use #4 bars then my minimum ratio cannot be less than 0.0020 in each direction? Even though my loads are way below the requirement in section 188.8.131.52. I haven't done concrete shear walls in a while, I have been doing mostly basement walls and grade beam. Just wanted to be sure I was reading all of this correctly.
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
In the components business price can often be the determining factor as to what product the manufacturer uses. For a great many mass-market products and applications, the low-cost off-the-shelf, one-piece stamped receptacle fits the bill. The price is right, the performance is adequate. Download Now
In today’s cost-sensitive world, designers are often driven to specify the lowest cost solution for every aspect of their designs to ensure that their solution is competitively priced and their company remains profitable. However, specifying a low-cost, low-quality connector solution can result in premature failure, considerable re-work costs and damage to reputations.
Increasingly, product and services companies are seeking more information and control in the
operational lifecycle of their products, including service and use. Better information about the operational lifecycle, and the ability to use that information, requires more than just unstructured data flowing back from products in the field.