Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Core Break Acceptance

Core Break Acceptance

Core Break Acceptance

I called for a 3000psi mix. 28 day breaks came in really low. 2150psi average. Had them core and the 3 breaks are as follows: 3750, 2310, 2260psi.

ACI-318 - — Concrete in an area represented by core tests shall be considered structurally adequate if the average of three cores is equal to at least 85 percent of fc and if no single core is less than 75 percent of fc. Additional testing of cores extracted from locations represented by erratic core strength results shall be permitted.

I meet both the 85% and 75% but would anyone consider the 3750 to be erratic? I'm thinking of making them take 3 more cores just to compare.

RE: Core Break Acceptance

That's a good FAQ. Nice link to have if you don't have the ACI available. Thanks.

I did check the design and it will work at 2500psi. Also, the job is in Florida and the FBC requires a minimum 2500psi for foundations per table 1808.8.1. Forgot to mention that before.

RE: Core Break Acceptance

I suggest that you read Neville's paper in the November 2001 issue of Concrete International about coring - "Easy to perform, Not Easty to Interpret. He lays out some very good observations based on his experience and on ACI, ASTM and BS BS/EN specifications. Basically, before coring, make sure everyone is on the same page as to the plan of coring and the interpretation of the results.

RE: Core Break Acceptance

I'm not sure what your mix design is. But this seems unusual. After 28 days, any decent mix should reach 3000 psi and likely exceed it.
I'd dig into this a little. Did they put in the right amount of cement? Did they reverse the proportion of fly ash and cement? Too much water? Was the cement old? (I've heard all of these happening) I bet if you check, there's a simple explanation.
My point is, maybe this is bad concrete that needs to be removed. The longer you wait for strength results, the harder this news is going to be to give them. If you're interpreting "loopholes" in ACI, maybe you're going to far.

RE: Core Break Acceptance

Sorry I didn't update. Jed you're completely right. After doing the digging, the contractor finally admitted that the result came from 2 different trucks and the lower strengths from a truck in which they added a considerable amount of water to. I had those portions ripped out and replaced.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - The Criticality of the E/E Architecture
Modern vehicles are highly sophisticated systems incorporating electrical, electronic, software and mechanical components. Mechanical systems are giving way to advanced software and electronic devices, driving automakers to innovate and differentiate their vehicles via the electric and electronic (E/E) architecture. As the pace of change accelerates, automotive companies need to evolve their development processes to deliver and maximize the value of these architectures. Download Now
White Paper - Model Based Engineering for Wire Harness Manufacturing
Modern cars, trucks, and other vehicles feature an ever-increasing number of sophisticated electrical and electronic features, placing a larger burden on the wiring harness that enables these new features. As complexity rises, current harness manufacturing methods are struggling to keep pace due to manual data exchanges and the inability to capture tribal knowledge. A model-based wire harness manufacturing engineering flow automates data exchange and captures tribal knowledge through design rules to help harness manufacturers improve harness quality and boost efficiency. Download Now
White Paper - Modeling and Optimizing Wire Harness Costs for Variation Complexity
This paper will focus on the quantification of the complexity related costs in harness variations in order to model them, allowing automated algorithms to optimize for these costs. A number of real world examples will be provided as well. Since no two businesses are alike, it is the aim of this paper to provide the foundational knowledge and methodology so the reader can assess their own business to model how variation complexity costs affect their business. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close