×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Successful Earthwork Fill Factor Computation

Successful Earthwork Fill Factor Computation

Successful Earthwork Fill Factor Computation

(OP)
I would like to take a poll of geotechs, and if there are any experienced earthwork contractors out there, of how they have arrived at computing successful Fill factors for earthwork hauling.

In other words, how much Fill material does it take to fill a 1 cubic yard hole?

Three scenarios:

1) All Fill is coming from the site, dug up from its insitu density.
2) All Fill is coming from offsite borrow.
3) All Fill is a combination of #1 and #2 above.

We need to account for not only relative compaction, but all losses and inefficencies encountered throughout the whole excavation, compaction, and transportation process.



RE: Successful Earthwork Fill Factor Computation

I have a spreadsheet I made for fill/borrow. If you would like a copy, let me know.
moisture content, specific gravity, density, void ratio all factor in.
alangolightly@rjwe.com

RE: Successful Earthwork Fill Factor Computation

from the truck, I'd use 20 percent. After all, it's about as loose as it gets, so that'd be a relative density of 0 percent, which equiates to about 75 percent relative compaction.

from native soils, I guess it depends on the in-situ density. You can always do some nuke testing in the excavation area to document the in situ degree of relative compaction. Let's say it's at 95 percent relative compaction, in situ. Well, there'd be no shrink or swell factor, unless 100 percent RC is specified.

I just don't think there is some universal answer, but I appreciate the question.

f-d

¡papá gordo ain’t no madre flaca!

RE: Successful Earthwork Fill Factor Computation

really depends a lot on the existing soil type, moisture content and density, borrow source and conditions as well as on the final desired compaction, on the type of equipment and the process used. these factors are generally based on local knowledge, so not really sure what the point of the inquiry is. you need to ask a local geotech or a local earthwork contractor

a recent project around here had 15% shrink (not from the truck) for excavation factor and 0.2 feet of ground compaction. I would expect far greater shrinkage from the truck.

RE: Successful Earthwork Fill Factor Computation

Natural re-compaction after putting it in the new hole from the truck? Or impact and rolling for compaction in the new hole? Either will be slightly greater compacting than the original (natural) of the fill dirt, but rolling or impact will compress the fill dirt more than natural settlement.

It's ironic that you have dig 1.2 cubic feet of natural dirt to transport 1.5 or 1.6 cubic feet of loose dirt to put in an empty hole that will only hold 1.0 cubic feet of compacted dirt. Percent of sand compared to loam is biggest factor in the re-compacting percent.

RE: Successful Earthwork Fill Factor Computation

Easiest way is to pay volume in place. I don't get involved with bulking and compacting factors as all jobs I have been involved with over the last nearly 20 years as used the volume in place for measurement. I am not a contractor so of course this might be important to him.

RE: Successful Earthwork Fill Factor Computation

(OP)
Thanks BigH...

I should say now that the intent and purpose is to help civil engineers develop an earthwork balanced site as they iterate through their road and site grading design. The civil design software tracks Cut, Reusable Cut and required Fill volumes. The cumulative volume is tracked for balance, and is equal to the Net of only the Reusable Cut and Fill volumes. These all have User provided factors with Cut and Fill factors typically >=1, and Reusable Fill factor less < 1.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - PLM and ERP: Their Respective Roles in Modern Manufacturing
Leading manufacturers are aligning their people, processes, and tools from initial product ideation through to field service. They do so by providing access to product and enterprise data in the context of each person’s domain expertise. However, it can be complicated and costly to unite engineering with the factory and supply chain. Download Now
White Paper - Medical Device Design Control
Medical device product development is a highly integrated and regulated process. Implementation of a requirements tracking solution requires attention to a variety of nuanced topics. When presented with the task of tracking the many concept relationships in a project of this type, the initial software solution of choice tends to be a two-dimensional text systems. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close