×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

50 Hz v/s 60 Hz
6

50 Hz v/s 60 Hz

50 Hz v/s 60 Hz

(OP)
I have a question I hope someone can answer: Why does Europe
(and most of the world) use 50 Hertz AC while the US uses 60 Hertz AC? Who decided these frequencies as the standard and when? I realize this corresponds to 3000 and 3600 RPM for the prime mover (assuming 2 pole machines) but why these frequencies?

RE: 50 Hz v/s 60 Hz

Those were "old good times" when things were decided; a lot of freedom, less hustle, etc.

RE: 50 Hz v/s 60 Hz

4
This is an excellent question.
The best answer and discussion is one provided by the superb article by Ed Owen( General Electric-Schenectady) in the History Section of the IEEE Industry Application Magazine, Vol. 3, No.6, Dec. 1997. The title of the article is "The Origins of 60 HZ as a Power Frequency. Additional information can be found in the following publications-which are all mentioned in the article.

B.G. Lamme, "The Technical Story of the Frequencies." AIEE Trans, vol. 37, 1918.

C.F.Scott, The Engineering Evolution of Electrical Apparatus; I. The Beginnings of the Alternating-Current System," The Electric Journal, vol 11, January 1914,pp 28-37.( My note C.F. Scott was also the one that "invented" the Scott-T transformer connection for phase transformation. I've used this connection to convert a three phase sytem to a two phase 4-wire system.)

B.G. Lamme, "The Engineering Evolution of Electrical Apparatus;XXIX, The Technical Story of the Frequencies," The Electric Journal vol,15, June 1918,pp230-237.

D.B. Rushmore, "Frequency," AIEE Trans., vol. 31, 1912 pp. 955-83. Disc. 974-78.

L.B Stillwell, "Note on Standard Frequency," IEE Journal, vol.28, 1899,pp. 364-66.

E.L. Owen, "Mill Creek #1-A HistoricalMilestone," IEEE Industry Application, vol. 3, May/June 1997,pp.12-20. this is another excellent article.

In summary it appears that the best evidence shows that the birth of 50HZ and 60 HZ was related to methods of solving light flicker associated with arc lighting. Because the type of fixtures were different in Europe and the US, the method of solution was slightly different( fixture construction and wind exposeure). In 1891 Westinghouse Engineers selected 60 HZ as their their new power frequency and that same year AEG engineers in Berlin selected 50 HZ as their standard frequency.
These two frequencies remain the principal power frequencies throughout the world. Interestingly enough in 1893 Steinmetz(just transferred from Eichmeyer to Thomson-Houston Companies) was involved in a problem on the system for Hartford Conn. Steinmetz solved the problem which had baffled many others and showed that the problem was caused by a transmission line series resonance which were excited by the 125 HZ power frequency in use. His proposal was to cut the frequency in half of the initial value or 62.6 HZ. GE installed the Mill Creek system in California at 50 HZ(1893).  This is discussed in E.L. Owens article mentioned above. GE found itself lagging behind Westinghouse in the sale of AC equipment and changed to 60 one year after the comissining of Mill Creek.

Hope this helps.





 

RE: 50 Hz v/s 60 Hz

Small practical "encore" to "... but why these frequencies?"
1. 60Hz is more practical to rotary 360° divisions. This includes clocks (analog and digital), including the computer processor peculiar frequencies, 3600rpm is more divisible to nonfractional speeds of rotary motion (especially 9 and 12 are convenient), etc. Impractical parts are: bigger watt losses, difficult conversion to decadic divisions, etc.
2. 50Hz is convenient to decadic divisions such as counters, speeds, frequency multipliers, calibrations, gear, linear motors, linear motion in meters, decadic MKSA system (SI), etc. It causes smaller watt losses, somewhat smaller conductor diameters for the same conductor ampacities, etc. Impractical parts: conversion to 360° divisions and usage, smaller speed of normally operated AC motors 3000rpm versus 3600rpm, etc.

RE: 50 Hz v/s 60 Hz

(OP)
Thanks for the answers and the refrences, this question has been bugging me for quite some time.
Gratefully,Dan76

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close