×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

#### Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
To Your Posts
• Keyword Search
• One-Click Access To Your
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
On Your Posts
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

#### Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

# Load Combinations

 Forum Search FAQs Links MVPs

## Load Combinations

(OP)
I have a case where I have a large heavily loaded cantilever that is doing some weird things to my structure. I am currently trying to design my foundation and I am having a hard time with the load combinations found in IBC 2009. I have a case where the "anchor" is resisting uplift load from the cantilever. I have other loads on the column (dead, live and snow). Now when it comes time to check the IBC load combinations I was all set to use 0.6D but that is only a combination for Wind and Seismic not for D+L+S. I am probably going to end up using 0.6D but I am just wondering what others would do in this instance?
Replies continue below

### RE: Load Combinations

I agree with your engineering judgement in this case. I would also tend to use 0.6DL.

I believe there are some notes saying that you can use 0.9DL for some of the other load combinations whenever dead load has a stabilizing effect. Then if you apply a 1.5 safety factor (i.e. you use the method from the old code) then you arrive at a de-facto 0.6 DL.

### RE: Load Combinations

= 0.9*1/1.5 = 0.6

### RE: Load Combinations

I take the same approach as you, SteelPE. I have even gone so far as to use 0.9DL + 1.4DL for DL for certain cases. For example, when I have a dead load that is causing overturning. I will use 0.9DL for the axial portion (stabilizing effect) and 1.4DL for the overturning portion (destabilizing effect).

Even if it's not an explicit load combination, I want to meet the intent of the combinations. My example may be a bit over the top, but it was a critical condition with an unreinforced concrete member.

#### Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

#### Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

### Reply To This Thread

#### Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login

Close Box

# Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.