Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Graphene vs polycarbonate

Graphene vs polycarbonate

Graphene vs polycarbonate

Hi Guys,

I was wondering if anyone could help me. I am trying to draw up a comparison between graphene and polycarbonate. I would like to know the impact both of these have on the environment, from the processing stage right through to the disposal.

If anyone could point me in the right direction of some papers that would be very helpful.

RE: Graphene vs polycarbonate

There is not much to compare between the two. Graphene is a two-dimension sheet that exists on the microscopic level and has no real usage while polycarbonate is a three-dimensional polymer with annual usage of millions of tons. There is no appreciable production volume of graphene, and multiple production methods have been proposed, each with its own environmental impact. Polycarbonate does have the problem of using phosgene as one of the ingredients, which is a known poison.

RE: Graphene vs polycarbonate

Polycarbonate may also contain unreacted bisphenal-A that according to some sources can be brought to the surface by washing in hot water and detergent. Bisphenal-A is said to bioaccumulate in fatty tissue and mimic various hormones, with possible negative health effects. For this reason, it's use in certain products, like sports water bottles, baby bottles, sippy cups, etc has been discontinued.

Rick Fischer
Principal Engineer
Argonne National Laboratory

RE: Graphene vs polycarbonate

This is impossible without a lengthy and very expensive life cycle analysis of both.

Furthermore, what you probably need is an LCA of unfilled PC compared to PC filled with graphene. For example, adding the filler may improve properties so you can use less PC and still have good strength and modulus.

Also, people talk about green solutions but rarely pay for them. So even if graphene filled PC "wins", that doesn't mean it will sell.

Chris DeArmitt - PhD FRSC

Plastics & Materials Consulting

Plastic Training Seminars

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - Reliability Verification for AI and ML Processors
Artificial intelligence and machine learning are seeing growing adoption in a wide range of applications. ICs used for AI/ML applications are characterized by large parallel processing computation units, high power dissipation, and complex circuitry that can deliver maximum performance within a strict power budget. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close