×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Aerospace Standard of hole quality evaluation

Aerospace Standard of hole quality evaluation

Aerospace Standard of hole quality evaluation

(OP)
Hi all,

I am starting to do my Final Project at my University and I am having some problems for search Aerospace Standards, because it is too specific.

In particular, I need norms, or specifics standards about proves to measuring holes qualities with differents tecnics and process.

Somebody know something about this subject or know any specific webpage? I have searched on google and I have found some articles and catalogues but no more. In www.sae.org and in the free trial Aerospace Standard, I didn't find nothing about Hole Quality Evaluation.

Thanks in advance!

RE: Aerospace Standard of hole quality evaluation

i think you need to contact a local airplane manufacturer or modifier. these standards are company specific ... mind you i'm sure that they're pretty much the same !

Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati

RE: Aerospace Standard of hole quality evaluation

(OP)
Thanks rb1957!

I have tried to keep contact with some companies. I'm waiting response.

RE: Aerospace Standard of hole quality evaluation

Gonzalvich...

Be cautious... there is more to this question than meets the eye. Hole quality is a combination of MANY elements. Each company has worked hard to understand/control these issues in their manufacturing practices; and analyse how each element affects joint life [material fatigue, fastener failures, etc].

Hole size/shape held within very specific tolerances for each installed fastener type [bolts, rivets, hi-loks, blind rivets, blind-bolts, bushings, etc].

NOTE. Fastener "fit" in the hole is a critical element of fastener performance: loose/sloppy clearance fit, tight clearance fit, net fit [hole dia = fastener dia +/- small tolerance], light interference, medium interference, presence of burrs, etc.

Hole surface position accuracy [relative to other holes] and bore/countersink/counterbore/spotface angularity relative to the hole bore and/or surface.

Hole bore/lip/edge/countersink/counterbore/spotface surface roughness; and control of potential sources of scratching/gouging/friction damage during drilling/reaming/boring.

Fit-up between layers of fastened materials during drilling/reaming and fastening: Tightly pulled/clamped together or loosely stacked/gapped.

CAUTION. Various type materials [aluminum, magnesium, titanium, SSTL, Steel, Heat Resistant Alloys, etc] have very dissimilar drilling/reaming qualities. a stack-up of "soft" and hard/tough" metals is a bear to drill/ream accurately/smoothly since each layer reacts differently; and the soft materials are easily damaged/scored by the harder/tougher material shavings.

Hole inspection practices to ajudicate hole quality, etc.

A few quick bits of info that may be useful for starters.

Any [almost] liaison engineering training course.
Any modern commercial or military aircraft Structural Repair Manual [SRM]
ASME B46.1 SURFACE TEXTURE (SURFACE ROUGHNESS, WAVINESS AND LAY)
ASME Y14.NAS 618 FASTENER, RECOMMENDED SHANK, HOLE AND HEAD-TO-SHANK FILLET RADIUS LIMITS
NASM47195 RIVETS, BLIND, SELF-PLUGGING, PREPARATION FOR AND INSTALLATION OF
NASM47196 PREPARATION FOR AND INSTALLATION OF BUCK-TYPE RIVETS
NASM81177/1 FASTENERS, BLIND, HIGH STRENGTH, INSTALLATION FORMED, ALLOY STEEL; DESIGN AND USAGE LIMITATIONS FOR

Various fastener manufactuer websites that provide recommended hole preparation for specific type fasteners.Etc.

Have-to go back to work.

Regards, Wil Taylor

Trust - But Verify!

We believe to be true what we prefer to be true.

For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible.

Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant – "Orion"

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close