×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Failure criteria of Composite

Failure criteria of Composite

Failure criteria of Composite

(OP)
Hello everyone

Since most Composite materials do not have a yield limit, is it fair to assume the first ply failure could be the start of "yielding" and the last ply failure could be the ultimate strength. That way of thinking makes composites similar to metals for failure criteria.

RE: Failure criteria of Composite

If you are going to think of a composite as a metal, think of a steel spring, the material is going to bend and return to its un-deflected position, until you over stress it, it is going to yield very little, then it will snap like a carrot. Once the plies are failing, you are into the "Carrot" phase.
B.E.

You are judged not by what you know, but by what you can do.

RE: Failure criteria of Composite

First ply failure with PMC almost always means some matrix failure but no fiber failure. Unlike yield the composite may return to its original shape. Any very small permanent deformation is likely to be from some plastic deformation of the resin, which a) may be very small and b) may be indiscernible due to the fibres springing back and forcing the resin back to very nearly the undeflected shape. If metallic yield is 0.2% permanent set (the usual material definition) it is often quite apparent on unloading.

Repeated FPF load on the composite may result in the resin damage propagating and merging with other resin damage. What happens as metal is repeatedly deformed to its yield stress is that there is theoretically no more plastic deformation but fatigue is of course quite likely with repeated appllication of Fty. How similar these effects are I'm not sure. Even carbon PMCs fatigue, with resin cracks merging and eventually some fibers breaking.

While prediction of last ply failure (fiber failure) is usually taken to be ultimate I'm not quite so sure of the FPF being considered as 'yield'. Some of the signs of yield may not be present but signs of FPF may include perceptible acoustic emissions.

I think considering a yield criterion for metal as having an equivalent in composite to be FPF might be misleading. For most steels and aluminums there will be quite a bit of margin between yield and ultimate. The difference between FPF and LPF will almost certainly be quite different from yield vs. ult in a metal. LPF vs. FPF will depend on the loading and layup even for the same material. And of course the difference between onset of metallic yield and ultimate failure varies massively depending on the alloy. Is onset of yield in a toolsteel like onset of yield in mild steel?

Perhaps use of analogy in engineering is of limited use in general?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now