×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

knee brace

knee brace

knee brace

(OP)
I'm having trouble with a rooftop equipment frame with knees braces on my post down. I'm posting down on columns and using pin connection with knee braces to avoid a fixed end (the roof slab is only 2 1/2 inches on concrete on a 3 inch deck). The issue is that the knee braces carry the gravity load into the posts and blowing the posts out. But if I don't put knee braces in my frame deflects like crazy. Is there a way in RISA to only have the knee brace act as a lateral brace and not transfer gravity loads?
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: knee brace

I cannot think of a way to do this. If the brace prevents the beam from deflecting vertically, then it doesn't care whether the deflection comes from gravity load or lateral load. Isn't that what you want the analysis to tell you? How the structure is actually behaving under the applied load. Perhaps rather than adjusting your model, you need to beef up those columns so that they can take the gravity load.

Could this be a case where the gravity loads are already present in your structure (with the beam deflected as a simply supported beam). And, you are just adding the knee braces to the existing structure.... Sort of a staged construction. Where the gravity loads act on the un-reinforced frame. And, any additional load (i.e. lateral load) would attributed to the reinforced frame. That's a non-linear type of analysis that RISA doesn't do automatically. However, you can manage it by manually combining the results from different models.

For example, you could eliminate the gravity load from the beam and just attribute it directly to the column. Then run the beam design in a separate analysis and use superposition to combine the beam results together.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close