At our firm, we use QuickLog. We've used GINT in the past but found QuickLog to be more user-friendly and less expensive. Fattdad: It seems that it would be illegal for the VA DOT to require GINT - that would give GINT an unfair competitive advantage. We have a CAL Trans project where the lead geotech firm is requiring GINT, but we are thinking we will be able to export our QuickLog data into the final format that CAL Trans needs. The people at QuickLog told us that this was possible so that we don't have to use GINT. I hope the VA DOT gives the other borehole logging software firms instructions for exporting their data directly into your "Geotechnical Database Management System."
oldestguy: I recommend QuickLog over Excel not just because it creates "pretty reports" but because its saves time in the following ways: SCALING - geological layers and all other features are auto-scaled as you type, FAST DESCRIPTION ENTRY - you can set up "pick-lists" of often typed geological words and phrases, WELL CONSTRUCTION - not easy to do with Excel, and SPECIALIZED GRAPHS - Water Content, Grain Size Lithology, and any bar and line graphs that are hard to scale and fit into an Excel column. I wouldn't have the Excel expertise to setup the initial Excel template, but I was able to easily setup our first QuickLog template.
Overall, if you have a lot of boring logs to do, I recommend finding a good boring log software program.