×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

(OP)
Hi,

I'm investigating the difference in precision between standard lathes and standard CNC milling machines, with respect to diametrical size tolerances and coaxial tolerances.

What are, typically, the tightest tolerances for each?

I'm an opto-mechanical designer and I'm currently designing lens barrels, and this information would be helpful.

Thanks,

Thanks,
Sean

RE: Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

Lathes will generally be more accurate and more cost effective for producing any kind of "turned" cylindrical part.

It is better to have enough ideas for some of them to be wrong, than to be always right by having no ideas at all.

RE: Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

(OP)
ornerynorsk,

Would you have any, general, tolerance numbers for diameters that range between 10 mm and 50 mm?

How much more precision can I get with a lathe over CNC milling?

Thanks,
Sean

RE: Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

I don't have any reference material handy at the moment. What you can do is to look up various mill and lathe manufacturers spec sheets and refer to positioning and repeatability. The thing to consider is that with a lathe, the roundness is being produced by rotation of its spindle and the inherant accuracy of the bearings, while with a mill, the roundness is produced by 2 axis' positioning themselves in a "step-by-step" manner. I will believe that the lathe has the advantage.

It is better to have enough ideas for some of them to be wrong, than to be always right by having no ideas at all.

RE: Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

(OP)
Thanks

Thanks,
Sean

RE: Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

(OP)
ornerynorsk,

Last question; I will also do what you recommended earlier.

Can I achieve +/-1um [.00004"] bore size, and +/-5um [.0002"] coaxially from one bore to the next inline, using a milling machine?

Thanks,
Sean

RE: Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

High-end CNC mills are capable of jig-borer accuracy for location of bored holes. I don't think they're quite that good on whirled/ milled holes.

Manual lathes and mills are not capable of micron accuracy in the hands of an idiot like me. ... but they are, in the hands of an experienced machinist, especially one who grew old along with the particular machine in question.

If your operation has its own machining shop, you could learn a lot by spending an occasional hour or day looking over the machinists' shoulders.
Do not touch _anything_ without permission.
Be polite and respectful.
Bring donuts and coffee. ... but don't bring them near the machinery.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

SpaciouS
At the accuracy you are asking for, the most common method is to turn to close size, then grind to finish size. or hone the bore.
Or use a jig bore.
B.E.

You are judged not by what you know, but by what you can do.

RE: Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

(OP)
Great.

Thanks everyone!

Thanks,
Sean

RE: Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

First question: Can you get them made that accurately? Yes.

Next question: For a LOT more money and much more time and by many fewer machine shops.

Next question: Do you really, really, really need them made that accurately?

RE: Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

0.00004 is going to be extremely difficult by any method other than abrasive finishing (honing, lapping, jig grinding) in my opinion. I toured a factory years ago that makes power steering pumps and the like, they are doing precisely what your requirment is, and they ended up building their own in-house "diamond sizing" machines, if I remember their moniker correctly. They had invested the better chunk of a million US dollars to achieve production volume capability down to that level of accuracy and repeatability.

Temperature controls of all aspects (shop, machinery, coolant, material, inspection) are going to be critical at those tolerances, as well.

It is better to have enough ideas for some of them to be wrong, than to be always right by having no ideas at all.

RE: Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

Can I achieve +/-1um [.00004"] bore size, and +/-5um [.0002"] coaxially from one bore to the next inline, using a milling machine?

No - you can't. Typical spindle runout+tool holder runout+tool runout+...are much greater.

RE: Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

(OP)
Viktor,

Q: "Can I achieve +/-1um [.00004"] bore size, and +/-5um [.0002"] coaxially from one bore to the next inline, using a milling machine?"

A&Q: My guess is that you cannot, but can you get there, or close, using some type of lathe. Radially symmetric features can generally be made more precisely on a lathe than from a milling machine (I believe), but by how much? What's the factor between the two? And what are typically the tights lathe tolerances when operated by a qualified machinist?

If I could get some kind of "best" baseline numbers, I can contiue to investigate how to get to those final numbers, such as with honing etc.

Thanks,

Thanks,
Sean

RE: Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

SpaciouS

"Radially symmetric features can generally be made more precisely on a lathe than from a milling machine (I believe)" - believe sounds as church activities whereas guess relates to Las Vegas. It does not matter what type of machine we are talking about. Rather, it is a mater of spindle accuracy and rigidity, tool holding and quality of tool itself.

As I mentioned, you cannot get better results as the stack of you runouts from the spindle, fixture, tool holder and tool - it's just physically impossible. The best spindle you can have today has 0.5 microns ronout, the best tool holder - 3 microns (say the latest and greatest Tendo by SCHUNK), tool (the best reamers ground to 4 microns runout...now you do simple math. Note that I did not add anything related to workholding - it is normally 5 microns.

However, for a given setup you can probably achieve +/1 3 microns tolerance if you willing to spend tons of money on high-precision machining components. Less than that is a nice dream.

Viktor
http://viktorastakhov.tripod.com

RE: Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

(OP)
Viktor,

That's what I was looking for. I just need some baseline numbers to put into my trade table and as I delve deeper into my research I will adjust those numbers accordingly. Cost is usually a big factor, but not for what I'm working right now. I'm working on an extremely complex and precise optical system and some of the expectations for packaging, accuracy and stability are near impossible. So I'm working on a concept that has not been done, but if it can be made, it could solve the impossible. That being said, cost concerns are taking a back seat.

Thanks again!

Thanks,
Sean

RE: Standard Lathe, Size and Coaxial Accuracy vs. Standard CNC Milling, Size and Coaxial Accuracy

SpaciouS (Mechanical)

If cost is not a big factor than you have another game. First of all, select a good tool maker who has high-precision grinding machine and Zoller genius 3 (or Walter Helichek Pro); make sure that they grind the tool in the holder as a monoblock and then check the resultant runout on Zoller with a detailed inspection report: make sure that they use the application-specific tool material not chip on-shelf junk and so on. Anything can be done - it is just a matter of cost, time and understanding what you are doing..Good luck anyway.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
White Paper - Industry 4.0 and the Future of Engineering Education
With industries becoming more automated, more tech-driven and more complex, engineers need to keep their skills and knowledge up to date in order to stay on top of this wave—and to be prepared for the Industry 4.0 future. The University of Cincinnati offers two online Master of Engineering degree programs designed specifically for practicing engineers. Download Now
White Paper - Comparing Multi-Patterning at 5nm: SADP, SAQP, and SALELE
Self-aligned multi-patterning techniques such as SADP, SAQP, and SALELE are increasingly popular at advanced nodes, but each process has its pros and cons. IMEC and Mentor, a Siemens business collaborated to identify potentially less-obvious process and design limitations and trade-offs between the three SAMP techniques. Learn more in this paper. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close