17-7 RH950 Heat treat problem
17-7 RH950 Heat treat problem
(OP)
I have what amounts to essentially a .005" thick spring made from 17-7 Condition A being heat treated at a secondary supplier to Condition RH950. For years, we have had no issues, but "improvements" over time have deteriorated the heat treat. In the same lot of parts, we are seeing both correctly heat treated parts (C42-C47)as well as parts that are obvioulsy too soft/weak (C29 or so).
Obviously, we are trying to get it back to where we were, but what step would you believe to be most critical in the process? We are currently analyzing run data for austenitizing temp, soak time at temp, quench rate, etc...
Thanks,
Keith
Obviously, we are trying to get it back to where we were, but what step would you believe to be most critical in the process? We are currently analyzing run data for austenitizing temp, soak time at temp, quench rate, etc...
Thanks,
Keith
RE: 17-7 RH950 Heat treat problem
These parts are thin so it is hard to believe that they are not being cooled fast enough to cold enough.
The time between conditioning and reaching -100F is critical, as is the hold time.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube
RE: 17-7 RH950 Heat treat problem
RE: 17-7 RH950 Heat treat problem
At what temperature should the clock start ticking to get into the deep freeze? Room temp? 150°F?
Metengr - One thing lacking at this supplier is good mapping. We want to change suppliers, but the validation will take a while.
Thanks guys,
Keith
RE: 17-7 RH950 Heat treat problem
I would like to see them reach -100 (well at least -90F) within 1 hour.
The hold at -100 should be 8 hour minimum.
Make sure that they are up to room temp before you go into age.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube