Most airports are required by the FAA to have emergency generators operating during periods of low visibility in the event that utility power would be lost so that runway lighting will not go down. The new engine rules (NESHAP ZZZZ) specify that "emergency" generators can comply with the rules using work practice standards (rather than having numerical emission limits). The problem is that ZZZZ defines "emergency" as periods when utility power is lost. Generally utility power will NOT be lost in the situation described above. Therefore one could consider this to be a "non-emergency" engine. Has anyone obtained an applicability determination from EPA on if such a use is considered emergency or non-emergency?
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
Material selection can be a guessing game, but it doesn’t have to be. If you’re an engineer looking to quantitatively analyze a material to determine if its properties fit your application, then you’ll need to be ready with a wide range of facts. Download Now
Teach pendants are a critical part of the factory environment as they act as the human/machine interface for industrial robots. But since teach pendants are handheld, they are under a greater risk of damage due to falls. Download Now
Product development in most companies requires a sequential iterative process to come up with the right product. It can be time-consuming and time is a resource that is in the shortest supply. Download Now