×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Running Track Replacement/Compaction

Running Track Replacement/Compaction

Running Track Replacement/Compaction

(OP)
Another compaction type question--the contractor is replacing an existing asphalt running track as part of a project to provide an artificial turf field--the design (by a consultant no longer associated with the project) calls for a compacted subgrade (without giving any percent requirement--though we would expect it to be at least 95%), 6 inches of dense graded aggregate, a 3-inch MABC I-2 stabilized base course, a 1.5 inch FABC I-5 surface course, a 0.5 inch non-porous track surface, topped with a rubberized running surface. The contractor has milled out the top 4 inches of the existing track leaving a 1-inch thick base course. He claims this will give a good starting base for the new asphalt layers and also he is afraid if he takes out that last inch that he might "expose some soft ground." The existing track while old, worn, and cracked in a few places did not exhibit any areas of subsidence. Presumably there is stone under the bituminous base (this site is within a flood hazard area, but has not flooded as far as anyone could remember). Presumably again, the subgrade was compacted when the original track was placed down (30 or 40 years ago). Of course, without removing that last inch it is unknown what lies underneath. So, does it all need to be removed, the subgrade "re-compacted" and the stone and pavement sections placed as shown on the civil drawings? Should a few test pits be punched through to see what is underneath, or is it reasonable to assume the relatively good shape of the existing track indicates that the base is acceptable and leaving the one inch base in place and working from there is a reasonable solution? Thanks!

RE: Running Track Replacement/Compaction

Using post-hole diggers, cut a few holes in and see what's below. Cheap and easy. Then you can decide. I don't like 1-inch of anything under asphalt. Constructability has to be considered and you need a stable material to achieve that. The loads from use are irrelevant.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now