Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

effective modal mass

effective modal mass

effective modal mass

Does anyone know if I can obtain the effective modal mass from RAM elements? I am trying to implement SCI P354 for vibration. In order to apply the formuals you need the effective modal mass or the kinetic energy per mode. Am I right in thinking RAM normalizes the mass of the system, or does it normalize the mode shape? The only reason I think it normalizes mass is the modal deflections for a simple beam do not have a 1 as a value.

If the modes are mass normalized I would think the effective modal mass is the mass participation factor squared, but that value doesnt make sense to me for a simple beam. Is the reported participation factor really for mass and not a modal participation factor? I guess I'm a little lost on which is which.

RE: effective modal mass

First off I'll caution against the use of dynamic respnse spectrum analysis for checking the vibration of a floor system. Experts like Tom Murray do not advocate that approach.

In the Ram Elements Dynamic analysis report it includes a section for normalized mode shaes with the following note:


** Normalized displacements to Phi*M*Phi=1 **

Modal shapes : 1

W = 16.39 [RAD/SEC] PERIOD = 0.38333 [SEC]


Node Trans.X Trans.Y Trans.Z Rot.X Rot.Y Rot.Z
[phi] [phi] [phi] [phiRot] [phiRot] [phiRot]

19 -1.20E-03 0.00E+00 2.03E-01 0.00E+00 -7.25E-06 0.00E+00

If that's not clear, here is some text from an old email regarding the units for mode shapes:

"In vibration theory, what is really important is the shape of the Eigenvector, the magnitude of the Eigenvector is not important.

We use mass normalization. We could also use "unity" normalization in which mode shape terms are divided with the largest value. In fact, you can divide with any number you want, it does not change the results (I mean calculated displacements, member forces, etc...)

Let's say, you use "unity" normalization (and for the argument sake, you are dividing every term with the largest value which is typically one of the translational components).
Then, units for the mode shapes are "mm" and "rad/mm".

If you do not use any normalization (which also leads us to correct results), then you have "mm" and "rad".

If you use "mass" matrix normalization, then (if I am correct) we have "Sqrt(KN/mm)" and "Sqrt(KN*mm)". I know, this is confusing and does not say too much.

But what we can say that reported mode shapes are consistent with some units. These units reflects the units chosen for mass. In SI units, the program uses "KN" and "mm". If you switch to another units, these mode shape values change. Hence, it is very important that if someone wants to use these mode shapes (other than visual purpose), then, their calculation has to be consistent with the units reported."

RE: effective modal mass

Thanks that gives me some sort of idea. And what I am trying to do doesn't involve a spectral analysis, the only info i get from the model are thefrequicnies, the modes, and the effective modal mass for each mode. From there I can use that data to analyze the response by applying a load at the maximum modal amplitude and do a SRSS analysis to determine peak acceleration.

The main reason I am doing this is so I can apply it to complicated floor systems. I notice a lot of limitation to hand calcs from design guide 11, and have seen some large discrepencies between DG 11 calcs and FE / real word results. Since i don't have a program that does dynamic loading, this is my only option.

From what you say, and from some sources I have, effective modal mass meff = (Li)^2/mii , and modal participation is GAMMAi = Li/mii, so with mass normalization meff = GAMMA^2 essentially. I guess some trial and error will give me a sense.

RE: effective modal mass

Effective modal mass can be easily extracted from a Ram Elements model. First, find out the total mass used in the analysis. Then, multiply this mass by the mass participation percentage for the mode you are interested. The result is the effective modal mass. Both total mass and mass participation percentages are provided in the same output file.

RE: effective modal mass

Hi structSU10, I am also developing a spreadsheet to predict vibration response to SCI P354 and the main input missing are the modal properties of the structure. I have exactly the same issue as you but I am using SAP 2000 which normalizes to mass instead of amplitude, quite similar to RAM Elements.

I'm still searching a way to obtain the modal mass for each respective mode from SAP 2000 output. The modal participation ratio does not directly reflect the modal mass (did a check from a simple beam model and the output is not as expected). Did you have any further research about this? I'm still trying to find ways around SAP 2000 output and will update if I find anything.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close