×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Section 713 Penetrations (713.4.2 Nonfire-resistance-rated assemblies)

Section 713 Penetrations (713.4.2 Nonfire-resistance-rated assemblies)

Section 713 Penetrations (713.4.2 Nonfire-resistance-rated assemblies)

(OP)
I have a building (cold storage facility)that I'm providing fire protection to that is constructed of 38" deep Red L web trusses. Plywood is attached to the bottom of those trusses. This creates a combustible concealed space 38" deep. 12" of R38 insulation rests on the plywood. I am installing a dry sprinkler system with upright sprinklers below the plywood to protect the storage below, and using 1" sprig ups with upright sprinklers into the combustible concealed space. My question is this...what do I have to do to the penetration in the plywood? IBC 2009 Edition is the applicable building code, NFPA 2007 Edition is the applicable sprinkler standard. I would think placing an escutcheon plate over the annular space would be satisfactory from a fire protection standpoint. It's not a fire-resistant-rated assembly. However, 713.4.2 addresses Nonfire-resistance-rated assemblies and under 713.4.2.1 Noncombustible penetrating items (which fire sprinkler piping is) states "...that the annular space is filled to resist the free passage of flame and the products of combustion with an approved noncombustible material or with a fill, void or cavity material that is tested and classified for use in through-penetration firestop systems." Since the plywood isn't fire-resistance-rated, why would I need to use a noncombustible material to fill the annular space?

Also, in 713.4.1 Fire-resistance-rated assemblies under 713.4.1.2 Membrane Penetrations Exception 5 states "The annular space created by the penetration of a fire sprinkler, provided it is covered by a metal eschutcheon plate." So if it's a fire-resistance-rated assembly that is penetrated, if it's for a fire sprinkler, a metal eschutcheon plate is satisfactory. It doesn't say anything about that under the Nonfire-resistance-rated assembly section.

Any thoughts?
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: Section 713 Penetrations (713.4.2 Nonfire-resistance-rated assemblies)

Why is the horizontal assembly not required to be a rated one? If it isn't, I am pretty sure you need to provide something to act as draftstopping at the penetrations and in the assembly if greater than 1000 sq.ft.

If I got paid for every hour I worked, I'd be a wealthy man.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close