×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

about MIL-STD-1796 . Have you seen it? Opinions?

about MIL-STD-1796 . Have you seen it? Opinions?

about MIL-STD-1796 . Have you seen it? Opinions?

(OP)
MIL-STD-1796 claims to be the new standard for aircraft, military and other mil-aerospace industries. Has anyone here had a chance to review it? Does it address modern electronic parts? (not interpolation on reliability of tubes)

Many of us know the deficiencies of MIL-STD-217 and others (for example, the incorrect assumption that an electronic part which is subject to constant hot/cold cycling has better reliability than the same part which is kept at a constant hot temperature; simply incorrect.) For decades, I have been hoping for a new standard which is more realistic.

The authors of 1796 encourage firms to put it as a contractual requirement for aircraft equipment. This document can become a major influence on the expense of new equipment. I would hope it has valid equations for modern equipment.

RE: about MIL-STD-1796 . Have you seen it? Opinions?

It sounds like you haven't read it either. 1796 is simply a condification of reliability beast practice from a design perspective. It's essentially what you would do for a design, given a customer specification that stipulates the environments and operating conditions applicable to your product.

" constant hot/cold cycling has better reliability than the same part which is kept at a constant hot temperature; simply incorrect."

I think you're misunderstanding something here. Every physics of failure scenario and analysis shows reliability degradation with increasing operating temperatures; it's the foundation of the applicability of the Arhenius equation to temperature activated failures. There is no assumption here; there's 50 yrs of data behind this.

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: about MIL-STD-1796 . Have you seen it? Opinions?

(OP)
No, I haven't read it. That was my question. Has anyone reviewed it yet? And about reliability; No, I'm not "misunderstanding" anything. Sounds like you misread my post and thought I was saying that temperature isn't related to failures. Failures due to temperature alone may use the Arhenius equation but that is not the only temperature-related issue. Physical stresses during hot and cold cycling eventually weaken parts, due to everything from micro cracks, differential expansion, to separation at boundaries. A device cycling from -55C to +125C constantly would not have the same failure modes as that same device at a constant 125C.

A big problem I have seen in aerospace an several different firms is that Reliability Engineers I have worked often do not take thermal cycling into account. Their prediction of 20yrs MTBF is shown to be incorrect when the products start coming back, then under the microscope we see the actual cracks.

RE: about MIL-STD-1796 . Have you seen it? Opinions?

I have found that reliability engineers usually depend on systems engineers to give them the correct environments, but projects rarely have sufficient time or budget to do a thorough and proper analysis. Additionally, it's often the case that the presumed environment actually looks nothing like the actual.

Generally, if you are seeing lots of failure returns, there was a gross underdesign involved.

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close